Foxy, "As for gun owners
choosing not to be violent in their protests. Well that
makes sense. Had they chosen to be vilent then that
would have defeated the point that they were trying to
get across wouldn't it that gun-owners are a responisble,
peaceful-loving group."

Another example of your prejudice blocking out the factual evidence put before you.

Most would have arrived at the simple, rather obvious conclusion that it would only be respectable, law-abiding, licensed citizens who would protest in that case. Not a snowball's chance in Hell that they would commit an offence with a firearm because they wouldn't have a licence if they didn't have an impeccable record. These people don't commit offences anyhow. They don't break laws and the police have checked.

All proved and certified as upright, respectable citizens of excellent character unlike critics such as sneering self, Foxy, who would usually not be able to provide any equivalent independent police certified evidence of their trustworthiness and good character.

To sneer that those respectable citizens would only have been deterred from violence because they wanted to make a political point on that day is petty, spiteful and low.

Foxy (enter right stage)

"There are many stereotypes of the Irish, being peaceful
isn't one I've come across very often".

But you have come across it.

The Irish have always been peace loving, they did squabble amongst themselves but they never invaded another country and only ever took up arms in defence against foreigners who invaded their country and occupied it.

Invaders are fair game.

Interest groups use a variety of tactics
to influence politicians. They may collect
petitions, take court actions, advertise in
the media, organise floods of letters to
legislators on particular issues (like anti-gun
control) pledge their members' votes to certain
parties or candidates, donate money to election
campaigns, or even resort to protests, or
even bribery. Frequently they arelobbying the
tactic of directly persuading decision makers
on issues.

I still recall a poster I saw in Los Angeles
put out by citizens against guns.

It read:

"In 1980 handguns killed
77 people in Japan
8 in Great Britain
24 in Switzerland
8 in Canada
23 in Israel
18 in Sweden
4 in Australia
11,522 in the United States

GOD BLESS AMERICA.

STOP HANDGUN CRIME BEFORE IT STOPS YOU."

Paul 1405, surprise surprise! the "Neo Nazis" are state agents just like the Anti Fascists! One of the most prolific Stormfront posters using the screen name "Cleric Preston" has recently been exposed as a well known "Anti Racist" from Melbourne who is also an employee of the ATO would you believe. When you see some particularly vile "Hate Speech" online 99% of the time it comes from either law enforcement agents,the bogus "Anti Racist" outfit called the ADL of B'nai Brith, the equally despicabler SPLC or other "Anti Racist" vigilantes trying to entrap teenagers or gullible and lonely people into giving out personal information over the net so they can "expose" them as "Fascists".
"Hate speech" is of no use to Nationalists, it turns people away from our ideas and makes us look crass and stupid, we want to win, how could we possibly take any advantage using the Brandis' model?

You read way too much into the motivations of we "Racists", you seem to believe that we're all invested in "Racism" as deeply as you are.
You have a sexual fetish for non white women, hence your objection to people who find miscgenation distasteful, for most "Racists" these issues aren't so deeply embedded in their personalities, it's just politics.
The demand for a separate nation for the White Australian ethnic group needs no justification, it's self explanatory and it's futuristic, "A brave new world is beckoning so the olden world must die!" we're the authentic Left wing, not the Right.
Abbott and Brandis and all the other liberals can go to hell, we'll be the first ones to be "persecuted" under the new HR laws, as it is they're not enforced but you can bet that once the new amendments pass they'll be locking up our people by the busload.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MOCOmgJ9-g&feature=kp

Beach, I only have to mention Jim Saleam and you pop up every time.
I did ask you several times to comment on Jim's rather dismal showing at the last Federal election. You never did reply, no "free speech" on that occasion, just silence.
I'm sure the 'Usual Suspects' on here consider much of the debate on this simply as political point scoring by the "lefties" on those reasonable free speaking conservatives. The free speech, argument is a smoke screen, these Tory wags have never been, and are not now champions of free speech, there is another motive and that is to give right wing journalists and others the freedom to vilify at will.
take note of what one of your own Barry O'Farrell had to say on the Brandis comment.

NSW Premier Barry O'Farrell has criticised comments by federal Attorney-General George Brandis that people have the right to be bigoted, declaring that vilification on the grounds of race or religion is "always wrong".

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/racism-always-wrong-barry-ofarrell-takes-aim-at-george-brandis-over-right-to-be-bigoted-20140327-35ju5.html

I consider Barry to be wrong 99% of the time, but I agree with him 100% on this one!

Paul as far as I know (not having met them personally) Jim Saleam and his group see themselves only as provocateurs, they run in elections to annoy the other candidates and to mock the system, it's the same mentality as Joe Toscano and his Anarchist club standing for office, the whole point is to embarrass the elites, not to take power.
As I said, due to your sexual preferences you take this idea of "Racism" far more seriously than Nationalists do, most of us would retain the HR laws if we somehow found ourselves governors, it's just that we'd enforce them equally across the board and to the letter.