Just thought this should be brought to the attention of those previously taken in by the unprecedented global warming fraud.

Climate Science Consensus: Last 60 Years of Global Warming Below Earlier Periods, Experts Say

The recently released UK's global HadCRUT4 temperature records show that in fact the earth warmed 0.58C in the 60 years 1894 to 1953, when CO2 was much less than today, but only 0.39C in the 60 years 1954 to 2013, despite the increased CO2 in our atmosphere.

This definitely proves any warming is not from the increased CO2 in the atmosphere. I wonder what bulldust the warmists will come up with to hide this decline

Hasbeen, post something worth reading, rather that your own "scientific" annalists. The warmists, what are they, so kind of hot communists.

Our fearless leader is being informed by CSIRO so no matter what Hasbeen says don't count.

Tony Abbott’s business advisor attacks “myth” of climate change
By Giles Parkinson on 17 September 2013
Print Friendly

Maurice Newman, the former chairman of the ABC and the ASX who will be the chair of Tony Abbott’s Business Advisory Council, has launched an attack against the CSIRO, the weather bureau and the “myth” of anthropological climate change.

In an opinion piece written for the Australian Financial Review, Newman said much of the public service infrastructure would be resistant to change because of their “vested interests” in the status quo.

Maurice Newman's thinking would sit well with Tony Abbott. I'm sure the Mad Monk would describe Newman as "My kinda guy!"

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/planet-oz/2014/jan/07/maurice-newman-climate-change-denial-tony-abbott-roy-spencer

Now that the 'Usual Suspects' have added the dreaded Warmists to their hate list, I have come to the conclusion they now hate 437.18% of the population. Cop this, the hate list;

Communists 10%, Women 50%, Pinko's 10%, Fabians 90%, Unionists 20%, Public Servants 30%, The Seven Dwarfs 20%, The Unemployed 10%, Welfare People 50%,Boat People 10%, Friends of Boat People 30%,Warmests 50%, and the Mother In-law 20%

Not that it matters very much but I will remain skeptical until they
use the correct amount of available fossil fuels as input to the models.
The computer resultant temperature gives a rise about half what is claimed
by the IPCC on its lowest projection.