The Forum > General Discussion > We are many and we are one
We are many and we are one
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Page 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
-
- All
Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Saturday, 1 February 2014 5:21:19 PM
| |
Another question, were all those American troops who had a less than white pigmentation celibate?
Contraception being what it was in WW II I wonder were there any half white babies? Did they survive and propagate? Posted by Is Mise, Saturday, 1 February 2014 5:57:29 PM
| |
Is Mise,
It's pretty unlikely, Negro troops were here in small numbers in support and logistics units but they weren't allowed to fraternise with Australians or if deployed to the islands take their leave in Australia. The U.S army was segregated so Negro troops had few of the same rights and liberties as White troops, this resulted in a lot of friction and resentment and even a mutiny at one barracks near Townsville which had to be put down by Australian soldiers. They had their own clubs staffed by American hostesses but were barred from entering the other pubs and dancehalls, maybe they could have sired a few children with prostitutes and such but their interaction with White women would have been minimal. There's some hair raising stories about the calibre and behaviour of Negro troops on this page including the one about the 73 who died at Mount Isa after using discarded cyanide drums to brew their own booze: http://www.ozatwar.com/usarmy/cyanidedeaths.htm Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Saturday, 1 February 2014 9:01:07 PM
| |
Is Mise I know you're trying to wind people up but you have to understand that in spite of what the "progressive" narrators say interracial sex is extremely rare, even in the U.S it's something like 1.5% of all couples.
Furthermore in 1942 why would a White woman seek the company of a Negro GI who wasn't even allowed into the dances, pictures and pubs and turn down offers from bona fide White war heroes like she'd seen in the movies or even turn down Australian civilian labourers who'd at least be able to take her out? Negro troops in 1942 were little more than labourers and rear echelon staff, all of the stories you've heard about Negro divisions liberating Buchenwald and Dachau or storming the beaches of Normandy are figments of the Anti Racist imagination, those events never happened. You can thank Steven Spielberg for most of the misinformation and fabricated commentary on the service of Negroes in WW2. If you talk to U.S Iraq and Afghanistan veterans they'll also tell you that even in the 21st century very few Negroes serve in combat units and there are none in the specialist, high risk areas like the Tier 1 operations. Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Saturday, 1 February 2014 9:33:24 PM
| |
Jay,
Extend your reading, in Brisbane Negro troops on leave were restricted to the south side of the river, one that crossed over, possibly by mistake, was shot dead by a US MP. Regarding the incident at Townsville have you got a reference to Australian troops putting down the mutiny? Posted by Is Mise, Saturday, 1 February 2014 9:41:11 PM
| |
Did you ever hear of the Tuskegee Airmen?
"The Tuskegee Airmen /tʌsˈkiːɡiː/[1] is the popular name of a group of African-American pilots who fought in World War II. Formally, they formed the 332nd Fighter Group and the 477th Bombardment Group of the United States Army Air Forces." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_Airmen Or of the African Americans who won the Medal of Honor? Personally I had a bit to do with the 3rd Battalion of the 7th US Marines in Korea and I knew African American marines and slept in the non-segregated tents with marines who were just Americans. I'm not trying to stir the pot at all merely pointing out the fact that Australia was not 'white' from 1788 although it was settled predominantly by the most mongrel race on the planet. Posted by Is Mise, Saturday, 1 February 2014 10:01:47 PM
|
We can all now accept that Australia from day one was a project of Liberal "reformers" and Socialist "progressives" working hand in hand at all times with capitalists, just as they do today.
Therefore all the positive attributes claimed in the name of Australia are attributable to the interactions of those three groups.
Yet those groups, their modern offshoots and successors refuse to accept that Australia's failures are absolutely their failures?
Or more to the point where they do seek absolution they'll still try to step sideways and frame it as the sins of the father then expect that penance need only be verbal assertions and oaths much in the manner of the old seven hail Mary's.
There's nothing "progressive" about "progressives", they way they carry on is in the manner of a medieval mob an their latest projects, such as consecrating same sex marriage, pederasty and the buying and selling of human children are positively Romanesque.
So in this country we have only the two throwback belief systems, we have no modernist tradition, no modernising schools of thought and no Avant Garde.