The Forum > General Discussion > Should there be any limitations with womens sport ?
Should there be any limitations with womens sport ?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Does it matter what women's football would be like? Or how the spectators might behave?
Surely the only relevant issue is that no-one ever prevented women from forming teams as men do and competing against one another.
If anyone can show me how 'men' ever 'prevented' girls and women from playing sports I would be most interested. My experience is that women - mothers and other 'protective' and often censorious women - limited girls, other women and themselves, not 'men'.
The targets of feminists were:
1. females joining in 'male' sports, activities and clubs alongside men; and
2. apparent higher payments by advertisers for some 'male' sports.
As far as (1) is concerned it is a case of feminists wanting to have their cake and eat it too. That is unreasonable, but feminists won that ground in the culture war.
There are girls in de-tuned (to suit mothers) Boy Scouts (now simply Scouts) and the boys are not so interested any more because the program has been neutered, affecting the adventure and risks they crave. In junior AFL for example, girls can play with boys, and bloody whiny they and their parents are, too. Now the fad has largely passed, but the devastation and higher insurance premiums remain.
In relation to (2), let the market rule and men cannot be held responsible for that. However feminists want laws to force advertisers who sell their marketing to private companies to artificially structure the market.
If the ABC was talking about women in sport (OP refers) it is as sure as God made little apples it was indulging in feminist politics. However like many other Australian taxpayers who pay for the ABC I would very much like it to return to the 'old' ABC that delivered news and other factual reporting and did not involve itself in politics.
As well, why must Aussie taxpayers be compelled to pay for the broadcasting infrastructure and paraphernalia for TWO national broadcasters that regularly lift BBC stuff anyhow