The Forum > General Discussion > FECCA wants more alien cultural diversity
FECCA wants more alien cultural diversity
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Page 16
- 17
-
- All
Posted by onthebeach, Tuesday, 17 December 2013 1:14:21 AM
| |
I will until death continue to be confronted by the God runner serves, or tells us he does.
In my Christian days Christ was warning against miss using his name. He told us about love not hate forgiveness and threw the money lenders out of his fathers Church. Sorry runner but your bitter confronting posts confirm my reason for leaving the faith. Posted by Belly, Tuesday, 17 December 2013 6:52:11 AM
| |
This bit:
>>the wolf in sheep's clothing (sheep skin to be exact)<< The logo of the Australian Fabians is somewhat stylised but I would have to say that it looks more like a turtle than anything else. See for yourself: https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net/hprofile-ak-frc1/c1.0.93.93/155314_184698688210529_2515155_s.jpg It is a very creative interpretation that can get 'a wolf in sheep's clothing' from that image. Onthebeach, when you look at Rorschach inkblots do you just see a bunch of pictures of like these? http://www.bideford.devon.sch.uk/history/history_images/anti_communism.jpg http://www.northernsun.com/images/imagelarge/Bathroom-Bolshevik-Poster-%284004%29.jpg http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-eUyeD0A2GNM/UE9U2UM9_GI/AAAAAAAAC2Q/w37ok9vhyU8/s640/Commies-Under-Bed.jpg http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_wft5MM5SDCM/TTMBoKEy7iI/AAAAAAAAE24/9w3ypcWzMhA/s1600/barack_obama_communist_propaganda_poster-p228939571446271460trma_400.jpg What do you think that might be telling you? Cheers, Tony Posted by Tony Lavis, Tuesday, 17 December 2013 7:05:11 AM
| |
Tony Lavis,
I would say you have been cherry-picking in your Google 'research' if you have not examined the origins of Fabianism and the meaning of the wolf in sheep's clothing, as represented by the black wolf with the skin of the sheep it has slaughtered draped over it for camouflage. The turtle represents it is said the creeping, relentless introduction of socialism. Done by sly means and stealth, creeping socialism was seen as the obvious choice after violent socialist revolution proved unlikely (socialists still do not understand why not, LOL). It is impossible for the Fabians aka 'Progressives' to imagine that most people in a free society want just that, to be free to make their own choices and not be controlled in all areas of their life by the State and the Fabians/'Progressives'. Here you go, there is even a group of good citizens dedicated to maintaining the security of the ballot and ballot box against the sneaky frauds by those you seem to support and form the examples given one can easily see why they are so concerned, http://www.wolvesinsheepsclothing.com.au/ http://www.hschapman.org/ Without doubt, many who have fled to Australia to escape State control of their lives would advise you and Foxy against Statism and the socialists in particular. Any wonder the 'Progressives' have been beavering away relentlessly to achieve State regulation of homosexual relationships and they have succeeded with the extension to gays of the common law marriage definition previously affecting heterosexual de facto relationships, with the final bit still to come. Now gays too have the State and its bureaucrats regulating their personal affairs and choices too. You should be careful what you wish for. Remember the socialists' references to 'Useful Idiots'. You might agree with them that people are 'Sheeple' who cannot be relied upon to make the right choices and need to be regulated by the State. But then the socialists are thinking of you too. Posted by onthebeach, Tuesday, 17 December 2013 8:52:14 AM
| |
otb,
Please wait, I'll get back to you when I feel so inclined to answer you about all your socialistic and Fabian concerns. In the meantime - relax and take it easy. This country will continue to do fine. Afterall aren't our ministers tough. Telling off GMH and China in the same week. Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 17 December 2013 9:42:16 AM
| |
cont'd ...
BTW: All degrees have subject majors in a field chosen by the student to specialize - especially in a Bacholor of Arts. That means that an individual specialising in a selected subject can be proficient in that subject. It doesn't mean that they work in that field. The former Prime Minister chose the subject of Law as her profession, but majored in economics to be proficient in economics - which helped her in her political career. Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 17 December 2013 9:53:23 AM
|
as part of her Bachelor of Arts degree. She also studied
law and completed that degree as well"
Very foxy! Does she have a B Econ or not? If so please cite university and year awarded. If she has a B Econ as claimed, why isn't in her CV?
Majoring in a subject is not the same as completing a degree.
Next, the wolf in sheep's clothing (sheep skin to be exact),
http://www.restoreaustralia.org.au/fabians-and-pm-gillard/
Specifically, which bits do you say are wrong and why?