The Forum > General Discussion > Liberating Language, Tres 'Progressive'!
Liberating Language, Tres 'Progressive'!
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
-
- All
I wonder if Joy realises the the irony of using that word !
Posted by snake, Monday, 9 December 2013 5:26:50 PM
| |
Dear snake,
I think Joy fully realises. Because Mr Pyne has in the past been referred to as a "powerless, barking Chihuahua..." Posted by Foxy, Monday, 9 December 2013 6:38:44 PM
| |
Crikey, whatever happened to this being a land where people were willing to call a spade a spade? We must have entered the Age of the Euphemism.
Personally I see no problem with calling cvnts cvnts. But if plain speech is too shocking for some peoples sensibilities then I'm happy to refer to Pyne as a cowardly, ungainly, nasty troglodyte. Cheers, Tony Posted by Tony Lavis, Thursday, 12 December 2013 7:01:39 PM
| |
Foxy, "Our political conversation must shift away from the mass,
infantile finger-pointing that now pervades it" Not a rule that you apply to your own posts, apparently. LOL Tony Lavis, The obscene language you might use at home may not be acceptable in public. Matter of fact if you used it at home referring to your female partner (for the purposes of the example assuming that your preference was heterosexual), it could be the basis of a domestic violence order. What do you say to that? Posted by onthebeach, Friday, 13 December 2013 2:25:09 AM
| |
>>Matter of fact if you used it at home referring to your female partner (for the purposes of the example assuming that your preference was heterosexual), it could be the basis of a domestic violence order. What do you say to that?<<
I don't have a partner. But if I did she wouldn't be a cvnt. Life's too short to date cvnts: I save my romantic attentions for pleasant female company. Given that she wouldn't be a cvnt I'd have no reason to call her cvnt. Calling someone a cvnt when they're not cvnt isn't a very good example of plain speech is it onthebeach? Cheers, Tony Posted by Tony Lavis, Friday, 13 December 2013 8:02:24 AM
| |
"Crikey, whatever happened to this being a land where people were willing to call a spade a spade?"
Maybe this is no longer a land where people know the difference between a spade and an effing shovel? "Personally I see no problem with calling cvnts cvnts." I prefer dysphemism also, Tony... so long as it is grammatically correct. There are many versions of this guide to the 'f' word around the internet, but at least this one comes from MIT (though the Dan Quayle reference dates it). http://stuff.mit.edu/afs/athena/activity/h/humor/Really.crude/fVck.grammar (As the modesty of the post's profanity editor forfends... replace the capital V as u would imagine to make it work.) Posted by WmTrevor, Friday, 13 December 2013 8:25:47 AM
|