otb,

Once again - stop it.

As Belly and others have pointed out to you on
various threads in this forum, "You invent my
thoughts and then slander me with that invention.
Post what you will but please do not in your blind
and rude fasion (vile) refer to me."

I am not, nor ever have been against police officers,
and pro criminals and accusing me of that and other
despicable things is vile,
and not admitting that it is your invention entirely is
totally dishonest. Go away - and find a kindred spirit
to talk to - there's plenty of them to be found on this
forum. I just happen to not be one of them.

Foxy,

Like Belly, you constantly get bent out of shape when anyone challenges your opinions. Not that you are slow to deliver a biff, either.

There is an an alternative.
You could 'man up' and counter with your own facts and argument what I (and others) have said in return to your posts.

Such as when I pointed out that the site you linked to is hosted by a phantom and there are various other unexplained and doubtless convenient omissions of detail. Why is it so shrouded in mystery?

Or when you say silly, provocative things (jokes you say) such as your, "Recent surveys tell us that you're much more likely to get shot by a fat cop if you run". Someone has to counter lies like that, or the become the truth.

Or when you direct readers to a site recommending the purchase and use of a restricted chemical.

Or when you continually bounce up with the same old same old mantras that have been dispelled so many times before and by so many well-meaning forumites.

Now what about going back and answering some of those posts?

Foxy,

otb is an expert at inventing other people's thoughts, fictionalising their actions and motives, etc.

He's just done a great snow job on my supposedly "never vounteering" over on an articles' thread.

otb says to Foxy:

"Like Belly, you constantly get bent out of shape when anyone challenges your opinions. Not that you are slow to deliver a biff, either.

There is an an alternative.
You could 'man up' and counter with your own facts and argument what I (and others) have said in return to your posts."

otb doesn't realise that it's bad form to verbal others and attribute to them thoughts and actions which he/she invents to replace cogent argument.

otb is an example of the worst kind of debater because most of his/her rhetoric is invention to service the rest of the bollocks he/she comes out with.

otb makes it up as otb goes along - sprinkled with faux outrage to spice it all up.

Nasty piece of goods.

(as Granny Poirot used to say:)

There are 33 pages of thought and work by various posters.

You have blown in twice Poirot.

Your first effort was about Rupert Murdoch, an obsession of yours.

<Poirot, "Erk!...unless his name is Rupert Murdoch.">

Your second is to complain about another thread.

BTT

But, otb,...don't you like it when your tactics are called out.

I'm a little fascinated by your penchant to troll women on this forum.

When you launch your extended diatribes and hang on "like a terrier" it's nearly always towards a woman.

You've tried that stunt on me numerous times, but Foxy has that dubious honour on this thread.

You are notable, when you go after someone, for usualy employing invented perspectives which you then attribute to your target - twisting their line of argument and reasoning to suit your agenda and to taint them with confected vices.

How like Loudy, who tends to do the same thing, to call for BTT.

You keep doing it, and I'll keep calling you out.

It isn't always about you, Poirot.

BTT