These threads are being hijacked by some religious proponent who believes everybody should listen to his rantings. I believe he should be barred from the board until he tones down his rhetoric and gets his written English together.

I never read or respond to his rantings which is my choice.

Well, it's absolutely gobsmacking that we have a thread to veto a long-standing member of this forum.

I'm surmising it inadvertently got through "somehow".

Since when do we do this around here?

Remind yourself, chrisgaff1000, that this is not our forum but Graham Young's... so by all means share concerns directly with him.

You might include constructive suggestions for the site such as counting links, line feeds and carriage returns in the 350 word limits? Or a link limit of 2 to 3 per post.

But a veto thread? No.

Besides, there are many others I would prefer to see on an eff-off list first...

I've just pressed the red cross and had a word with Graham.

As I said, I'm surmising this thread was posted inadvertently.

If a poster is not posting appropriately then Graham has recourse to ban the poster.

As WmTrevor points out, we don't need a veto thread to target individual members of this forum.

OUG has always posted as he does. If we don't feel like reading them, we scroll past. If we do, then we stop and take the time.

If we have a complaint or a comment about another poster we can ask Graham to forward a message to that poster. That poster may or may not respond. Comments about another poster need not be on a thread.

If one does not like the style or the views of another poster stop reading that individual's posts. Others may find something of interest in those posts.