Let me get this straight.
Its the "Cringing Leftists," who are really at fault.
Who insist that any number from any country for
any reason can come in.
1) Criminals on the run -
we welcome you.

2)Disease carriers - please don't
breathe on us.

3)Islamic terrorists - we hope
you'll live peaceably among us.

And it's the "Right wingers," who are the ones who are sane,
rational, people.
Afterall they only want to tow the leaky boats back
in stormy seas. As Scott Morrison tells us "We'll tow them
back," even though the Chief of the Defence Force disagrees.

Not ludicrous?

Apparently not for some.

And the Greens? Well, we all know about watermelons
don't we. And

We've been told that it's bad to sledge Australians and
Australia - but it seems perfectly OK to sledge the
"Cringing" Leftists" and the Greens.

They're not the "real"
Australians. So it would appear.

And those who then have the gall to talk about morality.

As Oscar Wilde stated:

"It would appear that morality is simply the attitude
we adopt towards people whom we personally dislike."

Lexi you left out;
4. Homosexual rapists, as in Manus Island.
5. Pyromaniacs, as in Manus Island.

Lexi: And it's the "Right wingers," who are the ones who are sane,
rational, people.

I suppose we're the only ones left after you take away the Left wing Greenies. Actually to make it clearer Lexi that should have been, right Wingers & Others, who aren't Greenies.

Lexi: They're not the "real" Australians. So it would appear.

You've got another one right. It's about time.

Lexi: Oscar Wilde.

Drug addict & a poof. (remember "Gay" meant something entirely different in those days.) I suppose you'd let him in too.

Isn't anybody going to comment on my previous post or does it frighten you.

Again

Now I have a question. The UNHCR sets up Refugee Camps over the Border from where refugee are fleeing from. The Australian detainee Centres facilities are much better than the UN Refugee Camps, so why are they complaining

Why doesn’t the UNCHR set up Refugee Centres in other places, e.g. Indonesia, Malaysia, and Australia?

Is it because the UNHCR only recognises Refugee & Asylum Seekers in the first safe country they enter under the UNCHR Convention. They do NOT recognise people who go Country shopping.

If the UN doesn’t recognize these people as Refugees & Asylum Seekers why should Australia?

Remember the UNHCR Convention is only a Convention. It’s not a Law. We are allowed to “not” to abide by any part we don’t want too & we can skip out if it any time we want too. That’s what it says.

Lexi,

You are always among the first up-front where there is any opportunity to sink the boot into Australians and Australia over migrants, legal or otherwise.

You should be thinking about the abusive parents who shove their children onto boats to win family reunion. If their claims were real they themselves would be all elbows onto the aircaft to demand asylum on landing. They could afford a stay at the Sheraton Mirage, Port Douglas Resort on the boat fares saved.

You should give the Dr Martens a rest.

Hi Paul 4205 (somewhere up there),

Getting a bit OT, but what the hell. Support for totalitarianism ?! How on earth do you come to that conclusion ? If anything, I'm a Left-libertarian, a sort of individualist-Socialist, but certainly opposed to any form of totalitarianism, such as the 'dictatorship of the proletariat' which always seems historically to have degenerated totalitarianism.

After all, since the Communist Party is the party of the proletariat, this necessarily means the dictatorship of the Party (as Kamenev wrote in about 1928, and got rebuked by Stalin for it - too close to the bone) - and since the Great Leader or Teacher or Helmsman was the leader of the Party, this means that the highest form (so the logic goes) of people's will is the dictatorship of the Great Leader.

No, I don't believe in that, Paul. That way lies fascism. No wonder some writers in the twenties, like G. B. Shaw and Sorel, could praise both Mussolini's Fascism and Lenin's Bolshevism - after all, they helped to create each other.

Without Bolshevism, there may not have been Nazism. Discuss

Oh well, back to topic: why do refugees (a) come to Indonesia ? Because they have learnt that, from there, (b) they can get to Australia.

If not (b), then not (a).

So, increase the annual intake, so that we lead the world in our per capita annual share of approved intake, say 30,000. And fly boat-people straight back to their point of departure, no recriminations, no penalties, just fill out the right UNHCR forms and wait your turn.

Remove any incentive to get on boats, and save lives.

Cheers,

Joe

OTB,

Please wait. I say respond to you
when you post something intelligent.

cont'd ...

BTW: I don't own any Dr Martens.
I find
Dr Martens a bit "butch" for my taste.
My preference for winter is more
along the lines of a pair of full-length
leather boots with high heels. Being rather
leggy - I can get away with wearing them -
in style.