The Forum > General Discussion > Economic migrants abuse asylum
Economic migrants abuse asylum
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Page 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- ...
- 79
- 80
- 81
-
- All
Posted by Lexi, Wednesday, 10 July 2013 4:45:41 PM
| |
It is a good unbiased report Lexi.
The report: A significant number of the negative initial assessments are overturned by the Refugee Review Tribunal or a subsequent judicial review. This is where a lot of the money is wasted. On Lawyers forcing Review after review after review of which the verdict is flip flopped then flipped again. This is how Lawyers make their money. One investigation with all the evidence presented & a decision made. That's it. No more Lawyers trying to make a buck. The report: Carr might be playing politics but the fear is that unless these issues are addressed, the majority of Australians - who are not against refugees - will become so disillusioned they will lose all faith in a system set up after World War II with the best of intentions. It's too late for that. The Majority of Australians have lost faith in the System already. It's just the Government that is running behind way behind the people. Posted by Jayb, Wednesday, 10 July 2013 5:48:43 PM
| |
TO ALL OF THOSE CIVIL LIBERTY AND ASYLUM SEEKING HALF-WITS AND DO-GOODERS. I HOPE YOU WATCH THIS CAREFULLY. THIS IS WHERE YOU ARE SENDING THIS COUNTRY - WELL DONE!
Definitely worth watching. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=44a_1176709269 Posted by Jayb, Wednesday, 10 July 2013 8:00:26 PM
| |
Jayb - You have put 1 link up to show the barbarity of people, there are hundreds of incidents that don't get the attention of this one.
If I was controlling a drone aircraft I would happily drop a missile in that crowd. So when people watch it, it is not an isolated thing, it or actions just or more heinous happens a lot. Coming to a state near you potential perpetrators courtesy of the Royal Australian taxi service by order of the Labor Government. Remember only 10 to 15% of refugees only are checked properly Posted by Philip S, Wednesday, 10 July 2013 10:00:41 PM
| |
Philip S: Jayb - You have put 1 link up to show the barbarity of people, there are hundreds of incidents that don't get the attention of this one.
This site explains why you MUST stone people to death. http://www.apostatesofislam.com/media/stoning.htm Coming to Australia curtisy of all of our Potential Terrorist Friends on OLO who advocate for open slather of Muslim Asylum Seekers into Australia. Posted by Jayb, Thursday, 11 July 2013 10:24:13 AM
| |
What has happened to all the Potential Terrorists & Muslim apologists? Strangely silent, why is that? I thought they would be out in force defending the practices that Muslims want to eventually enforce in Australia. We are a Multicultural Country. Stoning is just another Culture we should embrace. Shouldn't we?
On a more humorous note. You buy a farm then use your religious beliefs to push your neighbours around. http://www.youtube.com/embed/dUr1NxJDC94?rel=0 Looking forward to continuing the debate as to why we should allow Muslims Carte Blanche access to Australia. Poirot, Lexi, Cossomby, suseonline, P Jack, Anyone? Posted by Jayb, Friday, 12 July 2013 9:39:59 AM
|
Let me explain to you why I chose the article
that I cited earlier by Gay Alcorn. Firstly
it was a non-biased and excellent summation
of the current situation on asylum seekers.
Secondly although you brush her article aside
as simply being an "opinion piece," from a
journalist, she's much more than that. She's
actually famous for her news and feature writing
and has won 3 Walkly awards. She's also a former
editor of the Sunday Age, (prior to being Deputy
Editor). She is a regular Age
columnist and also writes for The Sydney Morning
Herald. She has covered elections in the United
States and has vast experience in the political
scenario of this country.
In other words she's well known for her
work and her news reporting and feature writing
is highly respected both for its depth and objectivity.
Of course, if you don't want to be exposed to other
points of view than the ones that agree with yours.
Fair enough. You are entitled to your own opinion
but of course not your own facts.
Cheers.