The Forum > General Discussion > PALE V PETA= Save the animals; eat a whale: PETA ?
PALE V PETA= Save the animals; eat a whale: PETA ?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Alanpoi, does your father keep his dairy cows almost permanently pregnant until they are worn out years before their time? What does he do with male calves? (I find it hard to believe that he would do some of the things done to dairy cattle to his kids, I'm afraid).
Are we seriously suggesting that we do intensively farmed pigs and broiler (meat) chickens and egg-laying hens even minimal favours? Or treat them with basic, common decency? If only they could talk!
PETA, (through www.savethesheep.com), Animals Australia and Animal Liberation all openly promote a carcass/frozen meat trade to replace live exports, too - it is simply that different organizationa have different advocacy strategies. I'm sure than none of them cares too much for having to promote any such thing and would prefer that animals not be slaughtered, but all clearly see this as the lesser of the evils.
Let's get a bit of focus here. In terms of suffering, the scale upon which farmed animals suffer is just horrendous. In terms of suffering, it is no worse slaughtering a cat, a whale, or a sheep, a pig or a cow.
I think that people are probably getting tired of the never-ending woes of livestock farmers, and community expectations are changing as people become more aware of what these people are prepared to do with, and to, these animals that they claim to "love".
Nicky