Staggering, really. Still you don't get it, Philip S.

>>While you are at it provide links to reputable media that support the inference you make the refugees are all good citizens.<<

I implied no such thing. I'm talking about your rabble-rousing. If you believe that your opening posts were merely observations on a mendacious government, all you have to do is to look at the reaction it drew to show otherwise.

>>When you come to read your comments you say the exact same thing lots of times, over and over again just like a broken record.<<

That is because you insist on misreading them, as you have done here, yet again. It was amusing to start with - I assumed that you were embarrassed to admit the dog-whistle - but it is now becoming clear that you are simply avoiding the issue completely.

>>Do a Google search are you really that useless you can't find anything<<

SPQR will have them - "scores & scores & scores" of them - at his fingertips, a shortlist of which I await with interest.

>>You will be pleased with this news HOMELESS AUSTRALIANS WON'T a suspected asylum seeker boat carrying 207 people has been intercepted north of Christmas Island.<<

This news pleases no-one. Except perhaps a certain class of person who uses the information to boost their personal campaign of fear and loathing. To everyone else, it is more evidence of how desperate people can get when faced with so little hope in their own land.

Pericles - Quote "Staggering, really. Still you don't get it, Philip S."

Funny because the way I see it it could be written.

"Staggering, really. Still you don't get it, Pericles."

Arrrh! you got me Pericles ...caught me out darn! darn! darn!

LOL

No actually, I am wasn’t jesting about the numbers. Now, I don't intend to serve them up to you (à la breakfast in bed) but I’ll give you a clue (since you’re lacking in that regard).

Start with UN bodies, the UNHRC, but not limited to the UNHCR –big on telling OZ about how needy “refugees” are and our obligations.
Drop in in passing at Amnesty International –always big on telling OZ its border controls are inhumane (and by inference we should accept all comers)
Then take a left turn to the political groupings/parties to the left of the Labor Party—The Greens and a whole lot of other little groups with “socialist” in their names –their major plank is refugee advocacy
Then have a look at the websites of various eminent citizens who view themselves as champions of human rights --Australia seems to have such persons in locust plague numbers –and almost to an Acrididae they are very vocal refugee advocates.
Then have a look at the various sites which go under ethnic banners . Sites that claim to speak on behalf of say, for example, Australian Tamils, Hazaras or Iranians –their message is more along the lines of “Come on down, have we got a deal for you” (and don’t make the mistake of thinking that there is ONE site per group, across the web there might be dozens for each group)

Then have a look at some of the major Oz based forums New Matilda, Crickey, ABC Drum and Punch,the editorial/journalistic input of each is almost exclusively sympathetic (panders even) to asylum scammers.
Then you have look at the multiple sites of/for the ABC & SBS at any one time each could be running a number of “moderated” programs and discussions which by design present asylum scammers favourably.
Then have a look at the refugee advocacy policies and statements of various local inner city councils (and while you’re there drill down into their library websites and see the “diversity” of opinion on such issues –betya by a ratio of 10:1 its all pro-refugees)
And then you have the govt funded groups like the Refugee Council –no need to say what they are spouting!
Then have a look at the myriad of tin pot sites --whose sole reason for existing is to advocate for asylum scammers—with names like, this or that city’s refugee support group, men for refugees, women for refugees, puppy-dogs and pussy cats for refugees… these are literary too numerous to link/list.

So while I’ll concede it isn’t up there with breakfast in bed at the Hongkong, Mandarin Oriental – if your purpose was to be better informed (rather than to try and catch me out) it’ll give your something to chew on.

literary s/b literally (otherwise some pedant will pick me up on it)

SPQR,

I woould''t dreamt of pickking youu up on thhat

_ somme of my best stufff is peppreed with typos.

: )