Ok, so let's change direction a bit, and let me ask you labor supporters, those of you that intend to vote for labor again, why would you do that, when you know full well that it is they, who are responsible for the mess we are are in right now.

Sure, there was the GFC and sure, one of the contributing factors of the MRRT failure was a drop in commodity prices, however, also remember, tax revenues for the Feds are up, not down.

I would also like to remind the likes of Belly, who obviously hates Gillard, that she is still the leader.

Remember, the definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and expect a different result.

small business ripping off the tax man, yep, it does go on,
rehctub,
There's no bigger ripping off the tax payer than the Public Service so, don't feel too bad.
The worst component being the pollies & their benefit schemes. And, no their followers haven't learnt any lessons.

Have you noticed rechtub and his lad indy, are putting them selves up as having understanding others do not?
Loath me if you want, but judge me on my posts.
I and few if any others have never refused to target my side.
And could if asked do the same for rechtubs side.
Indys seems to have died out in South America after fleeing Germany .
The thought, that Labor at its lowest point in history, sadly dislike it or not this is that time, still about 45% will not vote Liberal side of the fence this time.
And these two? time and again question the decentsy of every one of those 45%
Look every morning , gird you loins to be horrified, at the previous days posts, from t5hese two, tweedle dum and tweedle dee.
Without hesitation I could name the last six PM s, just bet these knowledgeable blokes would need ten days.

but judge me on my posts.
Belly,
It might come as a real surprise to you but your posts are all we CAN judge you on.
And you have the gall of accusing me of throwing insults ? Just look at the words in your post here. Talk about hypocrisy & lack of sense, dead in line with union thuggery. The kind that brought this great country to its knees. Actually you're doing us a great favour by exposing your mentality before the election so that the young gullible voters can see what you lot are made of. I do recall saying in one of my posts quite a while back that the real mentality of Labor will surface since the announcement of the 13 election. I wish I could be so right every time.

....Without hesitation I could name the last six PM s, just bet these knowledgeable blokes would need ten days.

Yes, it's called AGE Belly, and sometimes it does come in handy.

As for me, I only became interested in politics in the late 70's, however I do remember Gough, Frazer, Harke, Keating, Howard, Rudd and of cause the knife wielding Gillard.

Before Gough, I think it was Haden, or something like that, and I believe he went on the become gov gen.

DID I PASS THE TEST!

Continued

Continued by Rehctub

I admired two of these, Hawke, my all time favorite and of cause Howard, the man who led the most successful party of the past thirty odd years.

Now unlike you, I don't vote for a party, at any cost, I vote for who will do the best job, and so far, I have been on the money with Howard and Hawke.

In fact, if Hawke were to run again, he would almost get my vote, except the party he ran is nothing more than part of history, as labor leaders are now little more than puppets.

Another difference between us is that while I spent the largest portion of my working life, creating jobs, your agenda was to protect them, often at any cost and with little regard to the risk takers.

Now while this may not be a bad thing, your lot often set about to protect the lower end workers.

Now even that fine, but to insist they be paid the same rates, simply lowered the bar, as efficient workers felt duped, so productivity took a dive, as good workers went backwards, amd who could blame them.

Then, your lot again faught fior UN fair dismissal, resulting in casualization of the workforce, bringing along kaos and mayhem, with many finding borrowing fir a home very hard, without permernant employment.

So take a bow!

Howard wound these laws back, for most small employers and guess what, the country boomed, only to see Rudd/Gillard come along and take an axe to IR, resulting in loss of confidence.

If you care to remember, I told you personally this would happen, as usual, you fobbed me off.

So now I've answered your question, without insult, perhaps you could do the same and answer mine, that is, why on earth would you, or anyone for that matter vote for more of the same, in the form of Gillard and Swan, who, without doubt are the worst in modern history.

Now on the other hand, if you disagree that they are the worst, please explain why you think that way.