'As if scientists aren't always questioning and testing hypotheses. they are the "real skeptics"

yea Poirot after the non event of many of their prophecies you would think they would hang their heads in shame. No wonder science is scoffed at when people like you try and claim fantasies are science. The warmist brigade are not interested in anything that challenges their theory and cash flow other wise they would not of been caught out fiddling the books and data (a fact you conveniently ignore).

Au contraire, runnaire.....

http://climatesight.org/2010/11/17/the-real-story-of-climategate/

Let's face it, aside from your ultra-snazzy assortment of religious descriptors (such as high priest, dogma, prophecy, etc) which you slavishly deploy in, what I'm sure you consider, a dastardly clever manner every other post - what have you got "that challenges their theories" on the science?

Nada.....nothing....zilch.....zippo..........

All you've got is a conspiracy theory, which for some reason singles out, among scientists, those who practice climate science.

Do you have the same problem with biologists, chemists and medical scientists in general - Astrophysicists maybe?

Here's a new story - do you reckon these scientists are fraudulent as well?

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-02-14/scientists-discover-malaria-achilles-heel/4519684

'Do you have the same problem with biologists, chemists and medical scientists in general - Astrophysicists maybe? '

Only the dishonest ones who know that something that can't be reproduced or tested adequately is still only a theory. There are many good scieintist who don't just nod their heads in order to get a pass. Many in fact have phd's in science. You conveniently ignore the myriads of scientific discoveries by those who have their eyes open wide enough to acknowledge design despite demonisations by the likes of yourself and high priests such as Dawkins etc. You also gladly ignore data manipulation as done by many climate 'scientist' Pretty amazing for such a smart person like yourself.

Never mind, runner,

You can be assured that conservative/libertarian entities have the situation well under control.

As long as they can pour money into the unscientific denial machine, people like you will continue to do their work for them, by spouting your conspiracy theories willy-nilly across the blogosphere.

"Donors Trust" are apparently making the Koch brothers and Exxon look like two bit players in the sham...(so never mind about the funding - that's all been taken care of:)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/feb/14/funding-climate-change-denial-thinktanks-network?intcmp=239

(I note that you couldn't help yourself in your last post - "...high priests...." - you never disappoint:)

And the beat goes on:

http://desmog.ca/2013/02/14/us-scientist-caught-canadian-muzzle?utm

Canada, these days (due to its tar sands industry), appears to be doing its utmost to stymie the dissemination of climate-related scientific research and global outcomes in response to it.

It's so easy to nail the warmers, just get to start with answering these questions.

1.0 What are the international regulatory and governance processes now that Kyoto has lapsed?

2.0 Why have the international emissions trading markets collapsed?

3.0 Why has the renewable energy market collapsed internationally?

4.0 Why are all the key global “scientific” advisers to government’s trying so hard to keep their science secret from the public?

5.0 If the science is so good, why can’t it convince the international infrastructure that was created to support it in the first place?

The CCX collapsed in December 2010, by November 2012, Barclays US Carbon trading Desk closed, the UN, EU and NZ markets were trading at just off their all time lows at A$5.60, EU, UN backed credits A$8.45 and NZ trading A$4.10.

By January 2013 these markets had collapsed a further 40% with NZ trading at US$ 2.00.

RENIXX is the key international stock market index for renewables and tracks the worlds top 30 largest renewable energy companies based in the USA, EU and China. This market is down 90 percent since 2007.

In the USA alone eight of their largest subsidized renewable energy manufacturers have filed for bankruptcy between 2007 and 2012. Beacon Power Corp, Ener1, Evergreen Solar, Solyndra, SpectraWatt, Babcock and Brown, Mountain Plaza Inc and Solar Millennium. The cost to the US taxpayer is U$ 3.9 Billion.

A further six subsidized green energy companies are in default or in decline at a cost to the US taxpayer of U$ 6 Billion. The wind industry in the USA, the largest in the world, is predicted to lose 70 to 90 percent of its orders. Investors predict its total demise.

The USA’s EPA, NIWA, NZ’s, CSIRO, CRU, Pen State University, IPCC and Met Office are all providers of scientific advice to governments. So how come every one of these “scientific” providers are facing litigation and FOI requests against keeping their science secret?