The Forum > General Discussion > To rebrand or not to rebrand? ... That is the question
To rebrand or not to rebrand? ... That is the question
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
The reasons behind rebranding are different for every company, however it all stems back to ensuring that your branding is still current and reflective of the product or service offering. (In the eyes of the consumer, of course).
As mentioned in The Australian article Brands must go with the flow in a changing world, with rapidly changing technology and ever growing consumer empowerment, brands now need the ability to go with the flow of social change.
Gone are the days where the trusty strong brands can remain static and not meet social and technological changes. This simply results in an out-dated brand and consumers will move on to the next best thing.
Closer to home, an organisation that has embarked on the re-branding process is General Practice Workforce. General Practice Workforce is a Government funded organisation that is in place to support and improve the health status of Tasmanian communities by facilitating adequate and sustainable access to health services.
General Practice Workforce were restricted by not only their branding but also their name, as their services are expanding into other areas beyond just General Practitioner recruitment