The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > To rebrand or not to rebrand? ... That is the question

To rebrand or not to rebrand? ... That is the question

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All
@atmmarketing,

<< Brands must go with the flow in a changing world, with rapidly changing technology and ever growing consumer empowerment, brands now need the ability to go with the flow of social change>>

Yes to all counts.

And this is the way to do it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZkHpNnXLB0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Cf7IL_eZ38

Full marks Corning –I will never again associate the name Corning with boring old kitchenware.

And this ad changed my views on ants/anteaters forever.
Never ever, ever again will I associate them with dumb senseless creatures.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ac9XE2Koxg
Posted by SPQR, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 5:46:17 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Incidentally, at+m integrated marketing of 150 Cimitiere Street, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia, here's a small rebranding tip for you.

Do not, in an attempt to streamline their image, suggest that General Practice Tasmania rebrand themselves as GPT.

A French speaker would pronounce it "J'ai pété"

Incidentally, if you are planning to do work for General Practice Workforce, wouldn't your relationship with Health Recruitment Plus constitute a conflict of interest? Perhaps not in Tasmania, I suppose.
Posted by Pericles, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 10:03:33 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Incidentally, if you are planning to do work for General Practice Workforce, wouldn't your relationship with Health Recruitment Plus constitute a conflict of interest?"

Aren't they [previously] one and [now] the same thing?

http://www.atmmarketing.com.au/client/casestudies/online/health-recruitment-plus.htm

I hope GrahamY is being paid for this...
Posted by WmTrevor, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 12:01:36 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Well spotted Wm Trevor. I'd missed that.

>>Aren't they [previously] one and [now] the same thing?<<

Which makes the opening post even more embarrassingly self-serving. They rebranded GPW back in October 2010, and are now looking for applause.

How pathetic.

If I were Health Recruitment Plus, I'd fire their sorry "integrated marketing" asses tomorrow. Apart from this somewhat degrading exposé, the HRPlus Facebook page went live a year ago, had one update in May last year, and has one single post.

Slack.

But I do have to ask myself why I have spent any time at all on this thread. Perhaps (he said, answering his own question) because it typifies much of what I find utterly depressing about SME businesses in this wide brown land of ours.

Even - perhaps especially - those that exist on government handouts.
Posted by Pericles, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 1:05:27 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy