James, I'm not sure what you mean by trust funds, however, as for politicians, their tax payer funded super is just one of the perks and, you would be hard pressed to find another job that more than half the population hates you.

Of cause, we can all be one if we wish.

However, I have always maintained that they (politicians) should be accountable for their actions and, if they make a major stuff up (insulation as an example) then their golden hand shake shoukd be reduced.

Alternatively, Indemnity insurance would a a good alternative, as it is we the tax payer who pay their wage, and we also pay for the billions wasted along the way.

I wouldn't even mind if we funded the insurance to some extent.

Paul, As for a cashless society, I have no problems with that, in fact, had it been about 25 years ago, I would be about a half a million dollars better off, as I would have had this amount stolen over this period.

Combine the no cash with a 2% transaction tax and we would fly as every single cent spent would collect tax.

Perhaps we need a referendum on these, and other issues.

dont lose hope..things change in time

For those of you who have been following the John Anthony/Hill(JAH) Case, \..it is great to be able to share that he was acquitted,on the 12th of May 2011,../of the ridiculous and politically-motivated charge of attempting to "pervert the course of justice".

For those of you less familiar with this landmark case,John Anthony Hill is the Producer of the documentary film.."7/7 Ripple Effect".

For more details about this extraordinary case
and the trial itself,
http://mtrial.org
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com
http://terroronthetube.co.uk/2011/05/12/muaddib-acquitted/

There are two very important precedents that were established with this case that need to be studied in detail. There was a preliminary argument presented to the court to challenge both the jurisdiction and the sovereignty of Elizabeth Battenberg/Mountbatten, which was based on two distinct points.

The first point being she was knowingly,..and with malice aforethought,..coronated on a fake stone in 1953..and thus has never been lawfully crowned.

There are those who may wish to argue that this point is irrelevant, as Judge Jeffrey Vincent Pegden did at the trial,..wrongly thinking the Coronation is just a ceremony..*because she has been pretending to be the monarch for over 58 years.

In actual fact the Coronation..is a binding oath.;.and a contract, requiring the monarch's signature.!

Which brings us..to the second point.

At that Coronation ceremony,..Elizabeth signed a binding contract, before God and the British people,..that she would do her utmost to maintain The Laws of God...*This she solemnly swore to do,..with her hand placed on the Sovereign's Bible,..before kissing The Bible and signing the contract.

Please note well..that in The Law of God,..found in the first five books of The Bible,..man-made legislation is strictly prohibited.

The very first time..that she gave "royal assent"..to any piece of man-made legislation,..she broke her solemn oath with God

and with the British people..and she ceased to be..the monarch with immediate effect.

To date,..she has broken her oath..thousands of times,..which is a water-proof,..iron-clad,..undeniable FACT...She is therefore without question not the monarch,..but instead is a criminal guilty of high treason..among her other numerous crimes...as are..those acting under 'her' authority

OUG, I just don't get you.

One minute you post a perfectly normal post, like that one, easy to read, easy to follow, then You go back to the riddles that generally become too much work to follow, so I just skip them.

Are you two people posting as the one user by any chance?

rehctub, there's always an explanation.'

>>One minute you post a perfectly normal post, like that one, easy to read, easy to follow, then You go back to the riddles that generally become too much work to follow, so I just skip them.<<

This last post of one under god was cut'n'pasted from another web site.

http://www.henrymakow.com/hill.html

Clearly, he has no concept of plagiarism.

thankyou pericules..lol
plagerism is such a judgmental word..
i look at it as helping them ..get their story out..

anyhow the topic is taxpayers getting sukker punched..and we are..so i revenge this..by exposing the weakness of the authority*..they use to scam us.

pericules could say it better
but he thinks he is in the boys club..so accepts the little lies..the elites hold over us to keep us in poverty..to keep us subserviant..in our place.

i note people hate my words..
so i chose to help others..* use theirs..as much as i hate users and abusers..im sic*..of thinking or worrying about the minutia..when its the broad brush lies enslaving us all..

[yes you perry ..as much as me...
exept i know it..and act on it..not defend the offending..that is inherantly a part of it...

there can be no justice..if the just-lice po-lice/systen..only notes percicutes..our minour sins..while bailing out the real skunks

im noting the smoking stats reveal a 30 year old..smoker
who gives up..is a risk free of getting cancer>>as a non smoker[that dont surprise me..cause we got lawyers taxing us to death..[so their asbestos!clients!..lawyers..wont get sued for that..really killing you all..

off the nicoteen..onto the perscribed and SUBSIDISED real drugs...killing us off in the hundreds of thousands..but by clever lawyer use..these scum to escape notice by po lice

[the non smoking and the smoking have the same ratio's of cancer..[read asbestosis..and now im getting rsi..from the 'child proof lighters'..just noted they added some oily extender to the tobacco to reduce the leaf content..[it ads weight,..

IM MSICK OF THE JU-liars
doing deals for mates..like that deal dueliar made with the minning lobby..now being appealed..just like their LAWYERS intended..

baqh may they ALL rot in hell
none..NOT ONE.. is innocent..they ALL supported the scam.

having deniability dont excuse ,,that they made gain from the many lawyers scams..globally

where is the innocent defended?
or if not innocent ..why persicuting the petty
instead of following the leaders for the real huge treason..

wont get into betrayal by treaty..or secret letters..
and im pretty much over further thinking about the issue
\
we live in a lawyer hell..we can plead/beg..
but still its a lawyer wrote the law..and a lawyer judging it..and we appeal ..lol..to a lawyer

the 60%..of our [sorry your govt ..>>that are or were lawyers
must know..the treason's LIES SP{IN .cleverr words..OFTEN PLAGERISED.. they play on us everyday

how much..has govt revenue raising cost you..
i know its costing me heaps.

but i leave this life with a soul
i resisted the vile weaving evil..even if i dont use my own words
i use my own judgments to expose the words of those wiser and better than i to expose the true liars..the juliars..the howards..the obomanations of law..

feeling a little bitter
yes i am..so bitter ythat its best.. if i use others words
incase i damm my own soul in exposing their merde'..

but i know most posters on any forum are there
to negate its possable affect...on their masters vile works..not going to the grand plan..the fish rots from the head..the wiser the head..the closer to the rot

ignorants of the law is no excuse