The Forum > General Discussion > Cory? Bestiality?
Cory? Bestiality?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Page 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
-
- All
Posted by Poirot, Friday, 21 September 2012 4:36:49 PM
| |
Blow up dolls, vacuum cleaners, animals, i thought it was supposed to be consensual
Posted by 579, Friday, 21 September 2012 4:50:13 PM
| |
It still beats me why anyone else would give a damn what other law-abiding , consenting adults do in their own homes.
Suseonline, If you were to read what's written you'd have noticed a long time ago that normal people couldn't give a hoot what you lot are up to in the privacy of your home as you rightly state above. The problem is that you lot aren't happy with that, you see an urge to constantly shove your habits into our faces, you're not happy with being left alone. You want this confrontation because you lot aren't normal. Normal people do their thing without demanding others to have to accept you. Stop the constant demanding of the lowering of standards. Posted by individual, Friday, 21 September 2012 5:34:14 PM
| |
individual,
"...you lot aren't normal..." Lol! Gee, Suse, don't you reckon that's shocking news. Apparently individual is the new arbiter of "normal". Double Lol! Posted by Poirot, Friday, 21 September 2012 5:52:34 PM
| |
Lol Poirot!
I agree. For the record Individual, I am not gay. So now all those who aren't gay, but support gay marriage , are abnormal as well then? Gee, I would love to hear your definition of a 'normal' human in Australia? One thing is for sure, Cory's views on Homosexuality aren't considered 'normal', or he wouldn't have been sacked... Posted by Suseonline, Friday, 21 September 2012 7:45:15 PM
| |
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/8536817/bernardi-pulls-out-of-uk-summit
Reading between the lines it is very possible the bloke was asked not to attend. After all, he did travel all that way, then pull out. What ever the reason, I am truely stunned. Not by his actions. But by those only too willing to side with him. Standards are slipping and asking for accountability only from those you oppose is the reason. Posted by Belly, Saturday, 22 September 2012 5:07:07 AM
|
"...I simply don't see the link in asking the Question..."
Why did he ask the question in that case?
I'll tell you why he posed the question.
He posed the question in order to intimate that the formal sanctioning of gay marriage was the first step in a natural progression of perversion. He was attempting to denigrate the notion of gays marrying by associating it with bestiality.