The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Not for Prophet.

Not for Prophet.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All
While there is another thread dealing with the actual riot and people's reactions to it, I would like to consider the motivations of those involved.

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/the-incredible-muslim-hulk-proves-to-be-no-friend-of-islam-either-20120916-260e8.html

What is clear from various sources is that no one interviewed that was involved had seen the video, however, many had felt for a long time that the status in the west of Islam and Muslims in general was second class. The riots in Sydney and around the world which included violence and offensive language against Christians were a visceral lashing out at the west (perceived as the oppressors) with the film being a pretext. That this action is obviously counter productive is besides the point.

Australian society bends over backwards to accommodate those of different religions and cultures, but limits this by insisting on compliance with western standards, rights and laws, leading to a direct conflict with sharia law embedded within Islam. This leads to a vicious circle of isolation of a large portion of the Muslim community, and an extremism developing. The cry that this is isolated to a few individuals is undermined by a number of Islamic organisations refusing to condemn the rioters.

Action needs to be taken to reverse this trend, maybe even an intervention (in my opinion) to educate the youth in Australian values and the reasons for them. Secondly, prevent the access of those with isolationist views from access especially exclusive access to these youth. Neither of these will be easy without stepping on toes, and I invite the opinions of OLO as to how, or even whether, it can be achieved.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Monday, 17 September 2012 11:52:03 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I posted this in the other thread, but it fits better here.

Just a general comment on Semitic peoples…………they are not good neighbours when they achieve critical mass. Most Semitic people come from the Middle East, with the exception of the few that travelled to Europe over a thousand years ago, the best known of these groups are the Ashkenazi Jews.

Semitic tribes, and they are still tribes, embrace a culture whose rules were laid down over two thousand years ago. They fight amongst themselves as much as they struggle against outsiders and tribal group thinking pervades the society.

I recall how the European Jews who inherited Israel in 1948 violently protested when Ethiopian Jews tried to immigrate to Israel. Later it was the Russian Jews who did not fit the bill and were and still are ostracized in Yiddish and Orthodox Israel cultures.

In most Semitic nations you have a culture divided, even the Mohammadans who never kicked off until 700AD found a divider for their new societies….Sunni or Shia. The point is that the Arab brother is only a brother if he is on your team, if not you can kill him, and they do regularly. So the expectation that they will accept an infidel or adopt the infidel’s culture or rules is post grad dreamtime.
TBC
Posted by sonofgloin, Monday, 17 September 2012 4:47:55 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Please do not recount to me about the Arabs or Jews who you have know for decades and they are ordinary folks, like yourself, because you are naively wrong. They are ordinary folks, but there is one major difference. You can never be like them because as they perceive it because you are not from their tribe, and as simplistic as that sounds it is fact and the primary fact that gives them their identity as a people and you are totally alien to it.

Multiculturalism has failed, but a multinational society that primary adheres to one culture but with grafts from the home country added works beautifully and enriches the host culture. We have seen it in the New World Countries such as America, Canada, and here in Australia. I have the vaguest of memories of the post WWII immigration intake, it was the first time I heard Australian spoken with an accent, except at the local Chinese restaurant. Then the supposedly dreaded hordes from South East Asia and Vietnam invaded us and became great citizens, who embrace Aussie culture while keeping their roots.

Then we imported the Muslims, the Semites, and we received exactly the afore described cultural character traits that sees chaos and upheaval as the norm rather than co existence. But it is a critical mass thing, they will wait before becoming vocal and demanding, it's starting now
Posted by sonofgloin, Monday, 17 September 2012 4:48:01 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Shadow Minister,

I would be very welcoming of a thread that contains a reasonable discussion of the issue so am happy to contribute.

I think we really need to settle a question. While abhorring the violence both real and implied in the Sydney protest are we able to affirm the right of peaceful protest, even over matters that might only concern a minority of us?

I was offended over Piss Christ, not because of any religious beliefs but on behalf of the strongly affirming Christian friends I had, and because I thought it was gratuitous.

From what I saw of this latest film I again was offended, both on behalf of my fellow Australians who are of the Muslim faith and because of how bad it was.

Do I think it unreasonable for people to gather in protest over such a thing? No, not at all.

Everyone should have the right to be offended over anything we choose. We should also have that right to express to others the offence we feel. But violence and calls for beheadings should deeply offend us all.
Posted by csteele, Monday, 17 September 2012 7:41:22 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Shadow Minister, Sharia law is not "embedded within Islam". That's a false claim. It's embedded within Fundamentalist Islam. The VAST majority of Muslims worldwide totally REJECT the ancient, backward Sharia law. Just like the VAST majority of Christians totally reject the brutal ancient Christian law. I'm sure you already know this, but choose to ignore it in order to present Islam in a worse light. Nice try.
Posted by DiamondPete, Monday, 17 September 2012 9:11:50 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
We can dress this up any way you like, but it purely comes down to religion is being used as an excuse for violence, by violent people.

Some may be psychopathic or sociopathes in nature.

On one hand we get shoved down out throats about cultural sensitivity and awareness, and then there are those, as these demonstrators show that have no tolerance or acceptance of anyone who has different veiws or values from them,

So to them the answer is to behead those who do not share their values or views.

I can not help but wonder when the religous cleansing will begin, with christian's being sent to death camps just like Hitler sent the jews.
Posted by JamesH, Monday, 17 September 2012 10:00:37 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy