cont'd ...

And here you are posing as a man who's for the protection
of free speech. I guess we can take that to mean -
for you only and those who agree with your unique point of
view. "Wriggle" "Wriggle."

Dyslexia,

Thanks for the links which showed no compensation for small business.

All I saw was compensation for some large manufacturing concerns, and some very small assistance and tiny tax write offs for purchasing new equipment. This is a drop in the ocean.

The only solution is to pass the costs on. If you are competing against imports, too bad.

Dear Shadow Minister,

No surprises here.

You see what you want to see.

Sad really.

Really lexi,

I took the effort to read your links, looking for where there was compensation for small business. I couldn't find any. If I am wrong show me where, but please spare me the pitiful hand wringing. I can only assume that this pitiful "it's sad" comment is to compensate for your inability to find any compensation for small business either.

Perhaps you didn't even bother to read them yourself?

Dear Shadow Minister,

Keep trying to tread your way through
a base-level political path. Condemnation is the
key to your strategy - and if you believe that
it works for you well there's not much that I can
do about it.

Cheers.

Re: the Watts paper....It seems "co-author" Steve McIntyre is attempting to distance himself from the "rushed" presentation.

http://climateaudit.org/2012/07/31/surface-stations/

Quote:
"To make sure everyone clearly recognises my involvement with both papers. I provided Anthony suggested text and references for this article [I am not a co-author of the Watts et al paper]..."