The Forum > General Discussion > Chemtrails
Chemtrails
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
-
- All
Posted by WmTrevor, Saturday, 16 June 2012 12:59:41 PM
| |
The rest of the commentary is description of purported effects of exposure to environmental aluminium.
I can't work out how people can't join the dots of vastly increased commercial air traffic over the last 40 years and jet and vapour exhaust in the stratosphere – the rest of the atmospheric physics is fairly straightforward – though I don't pretend to be capable of working through that myself. By the way my international commercial airline pilot nephew hasn't stopped laughing since I raised the question with him – after describing stratospheric contrails he did observe that in over 20 years he hadn't noticed all this supposed of activity on any of his aircraft radar. Posted by WmTrevor, Saturday, 16 June 2012 1:00:59 PM
| |
WM Trevor is is worth an investigation.If you looked at the Trailer these Geo-engineers have admitted to experimenting with such chemicals in the atmosphere.They have found levels of Barium and Aluminium in the soil thousands of times what they should be.The evidence is there that something is seriously wrong.
You don't just close your eyes and hope it will all go away. Posted by Arjay, Saturday, 16 June 2012 2:35:53 PM
| |
jayb1: It water vapour caused by the compression of the air around the trailing edges of the wing tips. It's called cavitation. Same effect is caused on a boats propeller when it over revs in water. The tips of the prop drive the air out of the water & make bubbles, then the boat slips in air & slows down. It's dangerous to swim at the base of a waterfall because the air bubbles caused by the falling water in the still water causes a loss of buoyancy & you sink & swimming is usless because you're swimming through air. It why they put the curvy bit on the end of the wings of aircraft nowadays to reduce drag & save fuel.
BASIC SCHOOL DAYS PHYSICS, Grades 8 to 10, nothing special. Wake up people you are being led a merry dance by the Doomsayers of this world. They are having a merry chuckle at your expence. These people like to prey on stupid people. They pick on people who are easy targets. These same people will sell you a ticket in a raffel for the Sydney Harbour Bridge. Stupid people buy them. Like when they sold that yank London Bridge. He thought Tower Bridge was London Bridge. Mind you I have been known to start the odd furfie myself at times. I remember once at a market this woman was looking at some pumpkins. They were a bit discoloured on one side. I told her that the Supermarkets spray them with green dye them all the same colour. She believed me & brought two off the vendor. He gave me one for free & we had a good laugh. Have they sprayed Aluminium Oxide. Yes, into clouds to make rain. (CSRIO in the 50's. It didn't work. The on & off effect you saw in the Video is caused by the plane rising through different moisture density layers as it gains altitude. Posted by Jayb, Saturday, 16 June 2012 3:10:20 PM
| |
If they want to fix the Ozone Layer all they have to do is release Ozone from commercial aircraft when they fly over or close to the Poles.
I suggested this to a scientist about 10 years ago & he said that it would fix the problem but then people wouldn't stop using CFC's if they did that. I suppose people wouldn't make money out of the scare & Governments wouldn't have anything to scare their populations with then, would they? Posted by Jayb, Saturday, 16 June 2012 3:19:11 PM
| |
WmTrevor>> By the way my international commercial airline pilot nephew hasn't stopped laughing since I raised the question with him – after describing stratospheric contrails he did observe that in over 20 years he hadn't noticed all this supposed of activity on any of his aircraft radar.<<
Wm you can't argue with that, the guy is a pro and I would have thought that the pilots would have been the first to notice the unnatural cloud formations and that washed out wispy look as the trails expand, I have. Lexi my dear, I have no proof, but there are precedents. The poms: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2002/apr/21/uk.medicalscience The Germans: http://stevenjohnhibbs.wordpress.com/2009/07/25/german-government-admits-to-spraying-population-with-chemtrails/ The yanks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiJ_R8JVpi4 Lexi too many people from all over the globe doth protest and so many of them seem to present, thanks to youtube, as just folks from all walks of life with no particular agenda to peddle. In this instance too many people are saying the emperor has no clothes Posted by sonofgloin, Saturday, 16 June 2012 8:27:11 PM
|
You know I like to check sources so is this the same G Edward Griffin, the author of "The Creature from Jekyll Island", commentator on secret organisations and hidden agendas and who is widely described – without any apparent sense of irony – as a 'legendary conspiracy author'?
I'm surprised he had time to inform himself adequately about the topic of so-called chemtrails seeing as how he is an expert on the real Noah's Ark (DVD available) – not the one in the ice 'shown to have been based on falsified stories, myths and bogus documents'.
Such preoccupation with Griffin may have stopped you noticing, for sonofgloin's benefit, Blaylock's: "Chemtrails, Nanoaluminum and Neurodegenerative and Neurodevelopmental Effects".
Introduced thus: "from one of the most qualified people on the planet to asses the life threatening assault on all that lives which is SRM and SAG (solar radiation management and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering) This is yet more extremely alarming confirmation on the lethal nature of these programs. More confirmation that if they are not stopped, none of us will be healthy enough to fight for anything at some point. Even now, we can never know just how much damage has already been done to our health and the health of those we love. How much damage to all life on earth."
Do you know what Blaylock's evidence is?
I'll quote it, "But over the past several years I have notice a great number of these trails and I have to admit they are not like the contrails I grew up seeing in the skies. They are extensive, quite broad, are laid in a definite pattern and slowly evolve into artificial clouds. Of particular concern is that there are now so many dozens every day are [sic] littering the skies."
That's it for evidence!