The Forum > General Discussion > Do you think labor are getting the message?
Do you think labor are getting the message?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Dear o dear Hasbeen. You can’t assert that! You don’t know! And when we don’t know but can see a high likelihood, what should we do?
Err on the side of caution and plan accordingly.
See, this is the fundamental flaw in your whole argument – your assertion of things that you just simply can’t assert.
You should be a sceptic or a neutralist. Denialism makes no sense!!
You didn’t answer my query about population. Again, it seems that you can see the folly in ever-increasing population and hence presumably in the ever-increasing demand for all manner of resources, but you can’t or won’t see the other side of the equation – the non-increasing if not declining supply of essential resources….and the changing economics as they become harder to obtain or at least considerably more expensive.