Cleaning out the HSU is probably a good move, seeing someone has pointed the finger at the head female there.
At least it would put the union back to some sanity, while this can be unraveled.

Can Do has now scrapped a programe to save people 480 $ / yr on power.
Power is now going to be $ 600 / yr worse off.
He was supposed to save people money on power, but it just got a whole lot worse.

579, it took labor 20 odd years to ruin QLD. I doubt CN can fix it in 20 days.

Runner, I did hope you would answer my questions
I do not consider all homosexuals to be perverted,although some could be, do you?
and
Why did you link homosexuality with perversion?

As for priests I said: "Its my belief all priests are perverted dictionary meaning 'turned from what is right; wicked; misguided; distorted.' One has to be perverted to be a priest," Its my view that all priest, and I have met a few of em', exhibit some or all of the defined qualities of perversion, to varying degree. Some may be no more than misguided and turned from what is right, others however are wicked and distorted. I fail to see how that is being bigoted. If I was to say its my view that outlawed bikie gang members are perverted, would I be bigoted for saying that?

DO,

According to your measure of child abuse, the coalition had no children in detention or dying at sea in 2007. The real abusers who get children on the boats to die at sea would be the greens and Labor. It is sickening that you support such child abuse. Look at the footage of children drowning off Christmas Island and you see the child abuse of the greens and Labor.

By your own measure, I haven't seen a direct quote from Juliar or Bob Brown that the Catholic church must be pursued for child abuse, thus both of them must support paedophilia.

You wouldn't know the truth if it jumped up and bit you.

Should a civil court case be suffice for a parliamentarian to stand aside until cleared up, and what if the case is proven. Does the parliamentarian then resume work.
The allegations have come from a man that has mistakenly said in court that Slipper was seen handing over blank chits for cab fares.
The same man is accusing slipper of sexual harassment. Sex is not a crime and it is not a crime to ask for sex. The rest is allegatory evidence. Sexual harassment is a crime, how can this be proven, when the complainant made his situation clear, there was no more text's.
Should the complainant have made his situation clear earlier, rather than ignore text messages