Belly

You know that Abbott has always believed that man made global warming is c-ap. He even stated so before hypocritically towing the media line.

I have no problem with people disliking Abbott (though I obviously think highly of him). The ones with abbottphobia are intent on misrepresenting him. Much of the media that quized him re what he taught his daughters on virginity and Tony Jones disgraceful false demonisation regarding homosexuality is plain crass and despicable. The reality is that Abbott has been a good husband and father and that gets up the nose of many of the immoral failed journalist who constantly label him as homophobic, women haters etc.

Certainly Abbotts first and ingrain belief that gw is a total scam making charlotans rich should of been stuck by. Evidence now abounds for that view. On the other hand Gillards habititual lying and sleazy deals makes Abbott look like a saint. This is obviously what gets up the noses of the feminazis. Once they mocked him considering him unelectable now they despise him because unless something goes drastically wrong which it can in politics and life he will be our next PM.

GW is here to stay weather Abbott calls it crap or not. We can't live in the belief that the changing conditions are GODS will.
Abbott is a slime bag and will never do any good for this country.
He represents the 1% and his ambitions have been paid for.
His beliefs do not allow him to give impartial advice on women's issues.
We do not need a religious driven govt;
We must have govt; for all the people not the select few.

579

'We do not need a religious driven govt;'

Come out of denial. pseudo science and especially gw is a religion. It is full of dogmas, untruths, manipulation and every other mark of false religion. That is why our PM needed to blatantly lie to the public to justify her religous base tax. It just happens that God has allowed the public to laugh in the face of the silly High Priests whose prophecies were all doomed from the start.

runner you have been conned.
Abbott would ask you to be silent if he could.
He under Howard and before his leadership was for global warming.
I could flood the page with links.
Do not be fooled Tony has said both yes and no on every issue.
It is a standard for the bloke,to have no standard no limits.
I understand, in advance, the disappointment you will feel.
I felt it,after briefly thinking Mark Latham was something other than a rage filled fool.

Belly you write

'Abbott would ask you to be silent if he could.'

I am less interested in supporting a party or individual than I am truth Belly. I support Abbott not because he is perfert but because he is miles ahead of the current crop of deceivers including independants who went against those who elected them. If he was as silly as Turnbull in supporting a carbon tax he would immediately lose my vote. More than likely I would rip my ballot paper up. We have had enough of Governments ignoring what is good for this country and selling out to leaches in the United Nations.

Again Abbott is miles above Gillard on principal just as Howard was miles above Rudd.Obviously many disagreed with me in 07. Beasley was one decent guy from your crop even though he to believes in the gw nonsense. He had a good heritage and inherited some decent values from his father.

579,

That would make Gillard a lying slime bag? Direct insults are discouraged on this forum.

Lexi,

Labour has huge hypocrisy in demanding that the coalition produce detailed and costed policies when Labor never did in opposition, and
Labor is blocking any access to the public departments such as treasury etc or information that the coalition could use to flesh out and cost its policies.

Secondly policy development is the government's duty, the policies developed by the coalition under Turnbull were never even considered by Rudd. Policy principles are being developed, and some have been available for some time, such as a return of the pacific solution, removing the world's biggest carbon tax etc.

Abbott's main task is to hold the government accountable for its actions, and ensure that the coalition is in government after the next election. By this measure Abbott has been wildly successful.

Juliar on the other hand has been a dismal failure.