The Forum > General Discussion > Clive Palmers CIA Link?
Clive Palmers CIA Link?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
-
- All
Posted by spindoc, Friday, 23 March 2012 8:39:34 AM
| |
Not a good idea quoting from the Australian, they are proved to be biased and untruthful.
Tony is not in favor of supporting the auto maker, that is a surprise isn't it. Posted by 579, Friday, 23 March 2012 11:36:56 AM
| |
Well 579, I believe that maybe the grant to Holden is cheaper than the
dole that would have to be paid out if GM packed up and left as did Mitsubishi. However is there ever an end to it ? What about clothing and footwear manufacturers ? If we could employ 100,000 people that might save a lot also. We have got off stream but it is related to the stop exports. Many years ago I half joking made the suggestion that we should saw off the rest of the world and make everything here, except those obvious items such as large jet aircraft. We could use the money from food exports to pay for such items. The trend to buying local has already started and will increase over the next 20 years. I was laughed out of court of course, but not so many are laughing now. In any case in the new energy regime, large jet aircraft will only be conveying the very rich and politicians. The era of mass international tourism is coming to an end. Posted by Bazz, Friday, 23 March 2012 1:21:11 PM
| |
CIA, sounds like arjay has been at it again. So what harm does an environmental assessment do. Doesn't the miners have to do their own independently.
Posted by 579, Friday, 23 March 2012 1:45:55 PM
| |
http://www.smh.com.au/business/following-the-mining-tax-leader-20120323-1vp69.html
This link may well add to my view Palmer and his like, the Federal opposition, and too much of our self interested rich,lie to us. A view I also hold about carbon tax and climate change deniers. Ten years after Labor falls what will we make of this? Posted by Belly, Sunday, 25 March 2012 4:26:01 AM
| |
great amusments abound
blight has resigned[without a final vote count] surely thats a simple default[lnp win] clive looks like getting his free railway the new lnp leader cant be seen being tied..any further by clive recall ana blight got him a china contract worth 65 billion[but only under threat of courts is there a list of this serial pests complaints and collusions? how rich was he? before peter/wayne and blighty gifted him fortunes? recall when howard gave the new gst tax to the states the states didnt need increase their mining royalties now its time they were doubled *just to prove lnp isnt his puppy [lap dog..like the alp became] a by election on ana's seat NO WAY*[she resigned before what she said she wouldnt do] how can a new alp[lap leader get the press attention its the nat scam al ove4r again[only last time the nats [beurocrats]..took over the alp now they took over the lnp cause fat clive palmers daughters are just too greedyfor money and power remove gst restore true royalty rates[and stop building them free pipelines and warves and rail etc[make them built their own export link] cause where is that link leading once the export stops stop these rich fools before they steal the lot in twenty years what has all the infastructure to nowhere got[for the kids] railroads to no where[or a nice easy acces point for invaders] bah the lot of em BRING BACK BOTH HOUSES! sack every public servant not directly serving the public! stop these two party beuro-rock-rats Posted by one under god, Sunday, 25 March 2012 12:13:54 PM
|
Mr. Hepburn further admits that Greenpeace used the money in part to “draw up a strategy to undermine the local coal industry”.
We now know that in addition to this foreign funding for this campaign, it is also funded in part by our own Federal ALP government through the NGO’s listed, by Australian multi-millionaire Woods and by the Australian Greens who also wish to broaden the scope of this camapaign against ALL mining.
So who needs a “foreign power bogeyman” to blame when we have our own coalition government working against Australian interests?
It seems that Clive Palmer’s case for our government to resign has some merit. Will Queenslanders endorse that perspective or will the vanquished claim “it’s all about local issues”?