I've got a couple of questions.

Could anyone take a look at the make-up of the
current Liberal Party and tell us who amongst
them would make up a good team to govern our
country - starting with the job of PM,
Deputy, foreign affairs, et cetera - and why?

The only name I could come up with was Malcolm
Turnbull - but he's only one man and not a team.
I could not for the life of me see anyone else
that I thought could be part of an efficient team.
Julie Bishop for Foreign Affairs - I don't think so.
Barnaby Joyce as Treasurer? Joe Hockey anyone?

Seriously, before slagging off at Labor - take a
good hard look at the alternatives!

For starters Tony Abbott would make a far superior PM to Juliar, Julie Bishop would make a fine FM, etc.

Lexi, Try and take off your Rudd tinted glasses.

SM you are aren't you?
Pulling our leg.
Gillard is not much good but Abbott?
And Bronwyn? nearest she gets to FM if some one deports her for over acting.
Abbott is gonesky! Bronwyn is too.

Lexi, 69 or as you say, 71% of the vote is hardly what I would call huge support.

Either way, almost a third of her party don't want her in the top job that's almost one in every three.

Now as for your questions about the libs, well, where to start.

The most inportant role is that of leader, and with regatds to Julia V Tony. Tony wins hands down.

Now the other issue is one of party trust.

How on earth can someone (Rudd) hold such a high position as forieng minister, when he does not have the trust of the PM and most of her ministry.

At least thats the story today, but a month ago he was doing a wonderful job and was an excellent representative of the labor government.

So which one is he, a wonderful minister, or a back stabbing no good trouble maker.

Will the real Julia please tell us, as there are two of her, it's sometime confusing to know just who says what, the real one, or, the not so real one.

I thought the real one was the one who became PM and, ultimately appointed Rudd as FM.

Perhaps there's three!

I repeat, I am not confused for a minute Yabby. Economic conditions and indicators were slightly worse when Howard handed the reigns to Rudd than when Keating handed them to Howard. That is a fact sorry Yabby.

A fact you could never face, because such undue faith underpins your argument about the LNP and economic credentials. Instead of accusing me unfairly of confusion, you could actually present figures that prove my confusion if this is what you believe.

And SM there has never been a worse front bench lineup in the history of Australian Politics than the one presented to the Australian voting public than the current coalition offers.

And Lexi I don't think Julie Bishop is acting, thats actually her !. It's truly scary to think that she may one day hold public office.

http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/allprimarymainfeatures/B4DEE8EADE6ACC5ECA2572040020575E?opendocument

Well that is just the first of many, Thinker 2. If you read the
document, a bit further down it shows how unemployment dropped from
around 8% to below 5%, employment increased by 2 million.

But you are the one making the wild claims, so its up to you to
do the homework and produce the evidence for what you claim.