Belly there are a lot more people than csteel and I who now see the truth.The really big lunatics are on our side.The USA/NATO want to control the planet just like Hitler wanted to.They have followed his formula very closely.Have a look at Naomi Wolfe's 'Ten Easy steps to Fascism'.

Russia has had these power hungry psychopathic leaders in the past.China has tended to stay within its borders but US aggression may have changed that.The Brits,French,Germans,Spanish,Portugese have all wanted to conquer someone.They have delusions of a new Roman Empire.Not much has changed.

If we want to save the planet,spend money on education,not weapons of war.When women are educated on how to control their fertility and get job skills,they become middle class with few children.

The current lunatics are driving the whole planet into poverty based on the lies of AGW,not enough food,not enough energy/resources and not enough money.They are restricting all of these to expand their own power bases.

That's far more likely, Arjay.

>>Russia has had these power hungry psychopathic leaders in the past.China has tended to stay within its borders but US aggression may have changed that.The Brits,French,Germans,Spanish,Portugese have all wanted to conquer someone.They have delusions of a new Roman Empire.Not much has changed.<<

At least, it far more likely than the world being controlled by a global elite of international banksters, financed by increased oil prices. Which was your view only a couple of days ago.

>>When you have an elite who have had enormous power for over 100 yrs,then they have the resources to overthrow Govts and plan their unltimate dream,ie Have a NWO in which they can rule the planet.Rumsfeld,Bush Blair,Gordon Brown,Obama etc all talk about this NWO.<<

After all, if it is oil price increases we are talking about...

>>'How does the BMIC benefit from higher oil prices?'Their owners are also major share holders in all the big oil companies etc.Restrict supply and up go prices... The major owners of Exxon Mobil,Chevron Texaco, BP Amoco, Royal Dutch Shell, are; Rothschilds,Rockefeller,Warburg-controlled Duetsche Bank and JP Morgan Chase.<<

The unfortunate fly in this particularly fine-smelling ointment is that those companies you mention are predominantly buyers of oil, and are therefore adversely affected by the increase. The major beneficiaries of oil price increase are government-controlled businesses - NOCs, in the jargon of the trade.

So - what was it that you were saying about the Iran oil embargo? Somewhat more damaging - to Italy, at least - would be the refusal of Iran to pay its overseas debts.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/28/iran-oil-sanctions-idUSL5E8CS0L120120128

What is the Rockefeller/Rothschild plot behind that move, do you think? Bankrupt Italy, then take it over? And enjoy fegato alla veneziana and Barolo for life? Can't fault that plan, eh.

Arjay Obama legalized assassination for a specific job. The world is full of conspiracy's, none of which come to anything. It tends to over react some peoples head, they end up about six moves in front of the conspiracy, then again some claim to be able to look into the future. Conspiracy's are a close relation to imagination, kids are good at that.

579,who is to determines the definition of a terrorist? Occupy protestors can be catagorised as such.They were terrorising Wall St.There is no legal repesentation and no day in court to be judged by a group of your peers.

The people of Germany were asleep in the 1930's when Hitler rose to power and so are we.History repeats.

So much nonsense, and in such a short post Arjay.

>>...who is to determines the definition of a terrorist? Occupy protestors can be catagorised as such<<

But they are not, are they.

>>They were terrorising Wall St.<<

Hardly. They were a bit of a public nuisance for a while, but they have now been absorbed into the fabric of the area.

http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2012/01/occupy_wall_str_44.php

>>There is no legal repesentation and no day in court to be judged by a group of your peers.<<

That's true for terrorists,of course, but we've agreed that protesters are not terrorists, yes?

>>The people of Germany were asleep in the 1930's when Hitler rose to power...<<

I'm not sure what leads you to the conclusion that the people were asleep. There was a massive groundswell of support for the National Socialist movement throughout Germany, as it tackled the task of rebuilding the country, using patriotism and selflessness as its drivers. Hitler was revered by the - wide-awake - majority.

>>...and so are we.History repeats.<<

So, Arjay, do tell. Who is our 2012 Hitlerian equivalent, leading the people through a carrot-and-stick combination of rhetoric and physical threat?

And what does this have to do with Iran sanctions?

Yes and there was a massive ground swell of support when Obmana rose to power on a Socilaist ticket.He promised change under the banner of "Yes we can" and brought in fascist signing statements of Priventative Dentention,Legalised Assassination ofsuspected terrorists and his latest criminal edict the National Defence Authorisation Act.

Obama also expanded the wars into Pakistan,Libya and even tried to attack Syria until the Russians moved in.Obama promised to end the wars.