The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Julia's NBN gravy train resembles more a ponzi scheme than infrastructure.

Julia's NBN gravy train resembles more a ponzi scheme than infrastructure.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Page 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. All
SM does not see outside capital city's.
Posted by 579, Saturday, 14 January 2012 3:43:25 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Go for a drive around this country and you will see why broadband is needed. 90% of AU is living in the dark ages, with no communication. Mining sites roll out their own system, bugger anyone else. The greatest infrastructure job since the Snowy Mountains scheme.
Posted by 579, Sunday, 15 January 2012 10:19:47 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
579

90% live in the cities. Why should the needs of 10% dictate that 90% should pay much more than they need?
Posted by Shadow Minister, Sunday, 15 January 2012 10:27:08 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Infrastructure costs money, and does not need to have a majority rule to come about. City dwellers would not know the needs of the 10% that do not have communication. Broadband will open the vast interior up, to something more use-full than growing skinny cattle. Your disregard for the 10% is very narrow minded, and inward looking.
Posted by 579, Sunday, 15 January 2012 10:42:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
579 said;
Broadband will open the vast interior up, to something more use-full
than growing skinny cattle.

Such as ?

Too many people think that to get broadband you MUST have fibre
everywhere and it MUST be 100Mbit + to be of any use at all.
It simply is not true.

It is like demanding a four lane motorway from Sydney to Broken Hill.
You don't need it and cannot pay for it.
Asking the whole population to pay for it would not make it feasible.

I will at some time have 100 Mbits available but I do not need it
and will not pay for it.
A very few companies in the country areas will need 100Mbits and if so
let them pay for it. The other 9% will be very happy with 10 Mbits as
I am and many others are also.
All that needs to be done is get fibre, or equivalent microwave links
to every exchange in the country. To say that is going back to two
cans and string just shows the ignorance of those promoting that mind set.

As someone else said & I repeated, to make an improvement the remote
servers will need to be improved. However that would need big money
to be spent and there is no case for the public to contribute to that cost.
Posted by Bazz, Sunday, 15 January 2012 12:59:15 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
579

Your disregard for the 90% of Australians who will have to pay inflated prices to subsidise a small portion of our population is breath taking, especially since the take up for this new NBN is so low.
Posted by Shadow Minister, Sunday, 15 January 2012 1:33:40 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Page 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy