cohenite
'It should also be noted that the AGW 'theory' is almost identical to the Eden myth '

you miss the obvious. The evolution religion uses the same reasoning and tactics of the warmist.

runner,

"The evolution religion uses the same reasoning and tactics as the warmist."

By "tactics", are you referring to the employment of factual data and and rational analysis?

Yes, I can see that sort of behaviour is a very slippery slope indeed.....

Poirot,

'By "tactics", are you referring to the employment of factual data and and rational analysis?'

You mean continual false claims and silly assumptions like climategate and the High priests predictions of no more rain in the Eastern States. Oh that's right just change the story when you are wrong. Evolutionist continue to do that. It is no wonder the false stories are so easily spread among the true believers.

All newspaper circulations are down I expect Banjo. The one you would least expect to be down would be The Age, because it still resembles a real newspaper.

Climate denialism, is navel gazing. (Pure and simple)

Climate science is reportedly crap.

Medical science is crap. (e.g. Breast implants and other cosmetic procedures) for one.

The nanny state is crap. When we live in a world that discourages smoking and drinking, but allows corporations to put things in the food chain that a study reported in The Age today explains. Drinking sweet fizzy drinks have now been found to cause chronic allergic reactions such asthma and COPD, and are basically considered likely to be as harmful as smoking and drinking.

http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/diet-and-fitness/party-drinks-and-the-perilous-spoon-of-sugar-20111221

Tasmanian timber companies claiming environmental credentials, is crap.

My examples of crap are the first things that come mind from todays news alone, but there are many serious indiscretions now effecting our lives that are crap, based in crap and supported by crap.

It is convenient for the manufacture's of crap, to have us taking sides in the absence of any real answers to our direst needs. They're too busy making sub standard breast implants.

http://www.theage.com.au/national/doctors-urge-implant-register-20111221-1p5nk.html

And so the debate continues. At which time will the truth (particularly climate truth) become known ?, or relevant, or even worse, "super evident". Is it only then that we'll get on with the job of supporting a future?.

I'd like too think we are smarter than that.

Apologies for missing the link I meant to add after

"Tasmanian timber companies claiming environmental credentials, is crap.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-12-22/20111222-tasmanian-timber-products-boycotted-in-the-uk/374321 , in my last post.

cheers T2

Thinker,
You seem to be a bit short on practical thinking and sound more like an encyclopedia salesman telling me he is interested in my kids education. Should I be sceptical, you bet.

If you believe that humans have an influence on the earths climate, that is your business and when you can prove it come and talk to me with the proof. In the meantime I am not interested in your religous beliefs.

Yes, the age article was crap, a word you apparently like and i did not bother with your links. I am sure big Al or Tim will let us all know if AGW is proven.