Hi Hasbeen,
Your response appears to prove the old adage: Attempts to shoot the messenger invariably result in validating the message.
Cheers,
Anthony
http://www.observationpoint.com.au

Poirot your often reasonable and mostly logical posts seems to invoke some testy responses from those emotive types, we see in the climate debate.

The truth is, that the article to which Anthonyve refers, does make a lot of sense, considering climate skeptics have no actual or logical basis for their denial."Empty vessels make the loudest noise" as is said.

It is also possibly identical with people whom like to talk up the problem of boat people, or publicly rubbish or distribute unfunny low grade humour to your email address about Gillard in order to elicit favorable responses for themselves. Someone must encourage them.

I politely ask them to stop sending their often brainless output to my email address or too at least keep me out of the loop.

It's currently fashionable to deny climate change, or express hatred or take the mickey out of Gillard, or have a dis-proportionate fear boat people, even though logic and reality would determine that such emotional nonsenses are a complete waste of time and space in the general scheme of things.

The less educated and informed people become,as is the case today and worsening, more liars, urgers and agitants will gain more traction. Unfortunately the powers that be today would like to make mushrooms out of us all and for the most part are succeeding and getting better at this as time goes on.

Anthony as you can See snide ill informed or not informed at all, comments take the place of understanding here.
As a once hard fishing man beaches saw me every day.
This subject still attracts the ones we must throw back, good luck with it.

The self indulgence of warming High Priests along with those enjoying tax payer junkets for warming love fests just show the idiotic nature of the posted link from Anthonyve. The denial of the socialist who believe they have found a moral reason for wealth distribution is clear to anyone interested in true evidence. True evidence is not something the warmist or its backers are interested in. You would think after so many dismal prophecies that they would hide under a rock.

Hi Belly,
A good analogy.
Fortunately, time - and science - are on our side.
All we need is to be patient.
Cheers,
Anthony
http://www.observationpoint.com.au

Hi Runner,
Please see my response to hasbeen a couple of posts up.
It would seem equally apropos to your good self.
Cheers,
Anthony
http://www.observationpoint.com.au