I was chilled, Lexi, and the intention was convivial, not in the slightest was I meaning to be slighting. Merely attempting to continue the 'punny' approach to posts, as I enjoy the intellectual gymnastics this can involve when the exchange is light-hearted and well meant – I humbly accept not all my attempts at jokey sarcasm work.

As remediation I'll gift you a *non-convivial* line I had been saving up…

…I think it's unfortunate the OLO layout places a photo of the author of this drivel above text which reads Article Tools!…

That might indeed present a challenge when presenting the evidence, Wm Trevor.

>>Why do you assume the judge is male?<<

Although a good lawyer could always argue lex posterior.

ok some olo members dribble
http://emotevortex.blogspot.com/?v=0

for want of a better place to put it

it moralises a summation of a guys blog page
weaves arround a few issues...that prove..appearances arnt every thing

and best its a cut and paste
so hasdnt got my thick fingers all over it

this court case thingy
was that related to a dress
or the bonbo ob-session

anyhow we thought it was over
so the edit is my alternate amusment

That explains it Pericles, I've always got the concept of injunctive relief arse backwards.

Setting aside for the moment your novel concept of "…a good lawyer…", I accept your postulate in this case – as did the judge.

[Sidebar: Are you as impressed as I am that Lexi is on such intimate terms with Sacha Baron Cohen?]

Dear WmTrevor,

I am surprised that you have taken things so
seriously, and as Pericles once said,
"Imagine if you'd thought that I was being
facetious." ;-)

cont'd ...

BTW ; Why are you surprised about Sacha?
We're both fans of professional wrestling, and we're
both left-handed.