The Forum > General Discussion > Barry O'Farrell, Tortoise or Barnicle?
Barry O'Farrell, Tortoise or Barnicle?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
But all the same Barry has signed off on new CSG licenses, and nobody except those who will gain (a miniscule minority) want it, but he went ahead, the bastards want to drill in St Peters, what next George Street, they have already hooked into the Liverpool Plain, it is a big issue to many of us who do embrace common sense mining.
He has signed off on Utility rate rises, and if he flogs our Electricity off, as DD said it will cost jobs, and really there is not much other to discuss re Barry's second hibernation but on the other side of the house this term. So we are left to discuss EXPECTATIONS and here is my overview, comparison and analysis of NSW’s plight.
California has a projected State revenue of $83 Billion
California has a population of 37 Million
NSW has a projected State revenue of $60 Billion
NSW has a population of 7 Million
A comparison as basic as this speaks volumes about government waste/ corruption and the shabby delivery of services to the mugs of Australia. If Barry cannot find just 10%, just $6 Billion to give back to the taxpayers out of a $60 Billion revenue stream to service a measly 7 million plebs then is a dud.
By the figures above if NSW had a population of 37 million like California Barry would need a revenue stream of $300 Billion to do the job.