Lexi,

You linked the post I quoted from. Perhaps you should read it too.

Another shooting last night.
Mohammad, known to police was shot after an argument with three men in
one of the moslem suburbs. Police say it was a drug deal gone wrong.
Mohammad is in hospital in a stable condition.

My wife grew up in Lakemba. We had reason to pass though Lakemba &
Wiley Park a while back and she was horrified how the suburb has
deteriorated. It was dirty and the shops were a shambles.

She joked half seriously that it looked like Cairo.

Who will get shot tonight, watch for tomorrows bulletin.

Now, now Bazz, you know the figures on ethnic crime are one of the most highly classified sets of government data,we're not allowed to know who gets up to what. The Victorian Police even went so far as to deny that they kept such figures, they were lying of course and during the "troubles" surrounding Indian "students" they had to admit that they did keep track of "certain groups" and that Indian males and "New Zealanders" (ie Polynesians) were the two main groups they had to deal with.
As it turned out the Indian "Students" (Gujarati and Punjabi criminals and ne'er do wells) were found to have committed far more crime than they were subjected to, notice how since entry requirements have been changed this issue has gone away?
How many convictions of "Racist" assault by Whites on non Whites have been secured? correct me if I'm wrong but I believe it's two in my state, Vic...that's two, ever, in the history of "Hate crimes" legislation.
But in the period, '09-10, the "troubles", Indian Nationals alone were reported by Police to have committed around 250 assaults, around 80 rapes and four murders, not to mention road deaths, traffic accidents, theft, extortion, robbery, white collar crimes and fraud.

SM,

I read the article - that's why I cited it.
However, I read ALL of it - not only the
selected bits that suit your agenda.
Good try!

Jay,

You need to do a bit more research on the
web about attacks on Indian students.
There's several websites with the infromation.
You'd have more credibility if you researched
things before posting. The Age, The Sydney
Morning Herald, have done articles on the subject.
The facts are a bit different to what you're
posting.

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/activist-judges-give-mixed-signals-20110905-1ju51.html
An article that I offer as a rebuttal of the threads title, one worth a read.
We all should focus on this, I do not talk in defense of Gillard/Labor but truth.
So very much said against both, is constructed therefore untrue with deliberate intent.
It however is true, those who had no fear in replacing Rudd, act now like frightened mice.

Those who had no fear in deposing Rudd thought that they couldn't lose because they'd have "the women's vote". The women of Australia have proven to be less easily manipulated than those cynics thought.

They act like frightened mice because they have nothing to offer. As Orwell put it so suucinctly:"These new movements, of course, grew out of the old ones and tended to keep their names and pay lip-service to their ideology. But the purpose of all of them was to arrest progress and freeze history at a chosen moment. The familiar pendulum swing was to happen once more, and then stop."

Only it turns out that they didn;t know as much as they thought they did. Further, they have abandoned the roots of Labor in favor of trying to pander to a group that can never be satisfied - middle class women. What a bunch of tools.