The Forum > General Discussion > The Succession of Western Australia
The Succession of Western Australia
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- ...
- 9
- 10
- 11
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
I suppose you have a point. After all the minerals belong to all Australians. Its Australia. Another thing its pretty wild and woolly in NT & WA. I dont mind it myself but my point is we can have two states not becoming civilized. One of our daily problems Ludwig is coordinating the different states with the different so called codes of practices. Its a nightmare already. I think they are basing their strategy on greed tbo. What I mean by that is- they feel the minerals are theirs and not the Australian public's.
The fact is these resources belong to the whole of Australia - not just western Australians.
My other concern would be WA have a bad habit's of putting all their eggs in one basket.
We have seen this with live exports because they have not bothered to have alternative markets. Therefor its quite unsustainable.
As soon as something goes wrong the entire industry stops.
Now they want to do likewise with minerals. If it were up to me I might allow it - because when the minerals run out in 50?
Thats when they will want to return to the fold.
A very dangerous idea for peoples grandkids-- but no skin off my nose
Cheers