The Forum > General Discussion > Knives are being sharpened for Julia Gillard.
Knives are being sharpened for Julia Gillard.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Page 15
- 16
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
It's hard for Col R., to get the big picture. He has such a small screen.
Financial experts tell us, Abbott's claim that "since the middle of 2009, interest rate rises have added $500 a month to mortgage repayments," is a lot of economic twaddle. Housing interest rates have risen by about 2 percent since mid-2009, but mid 2009 was the middle of the global financial crisis. It's a credit to the Government that it handled the GFC so well that we didn't have to push official interest rates down to US levels (near zero), which would have caused severe problems as interest rates recover to normal levels."
Housing interest rates are now lower than they were when the Howard government left office. His claim that interest rates will fall if he brings in a large budget surplus, as the Howard government did (while leaving us with a severe deficit in our infrastructure and in our institutional, environmental and social capital - depleting our assets), shows how little he understands the working of financial markets."
"Abbott refers to that cash surplus of the Howard government as "70 billion in net assets," displaying a difficulty in understanding just what an asset is. One would expect a government in office during a cyclical boom to accumulate a budget surplus, as the Howard government did, but it did so by leaving us as stated previously, with a severe deficit in our infrastructure and in our instituional, environmental and social capital. The Howard government depleted our assets."
The financial experts summ things up in the following way: "To put the basic arithmetic as simply as possible, we cannot go on letting middle-class welfare squeeze our public expenditire, at the cost of our government services and public investment. If we are to prosper we need a mix of public and private services and of public and private investment. A "left" leaning government would be inclined to sustain welfare outlays, using taxes to pay for public services. A "right" leaning government would be inclined to finance public services out of cuts to welfare."