still avoiding it, Pericles?
You can't deny a statement unless it's asked as a question? Come on, be serious.
As for giving out insults while using the protection of a pseudonym, isn't that a quaint idea for this site? And aren't you as guilty as any? So is Pericles a pseudonym or your real name?

I did ask one direct question, ' Do you think it's OK for a muslim to use 'free speech' to march down the street carrying anti-west banners threatening death to infidels?' What's your excuse for not answering that one, eh?

Why, so you did, Ms Powerless

>>I did ask one direct question, 'Do you think it's OK for a muslim to use 'free speech' to march down the street carrying anti-west banners threatening death to infidels?' What's your excuse for not answering that one, eh?<<

I must have missed it amongst all the garbage.

My answer is no, there should be no free speech protection for banners threatening death, to anyone.

Next?

peurile excuse, Peniscles. See, I can play with names too to get down to your level.

Geet Wilder has been found not guilty on all charges.

Predictable.

>>Geet Wilder has been found not guilty on all charges.<<

As someone earlier on this thread said wisely...

>>I anticipate that the court will clear Wilders, in order to avoid doing exactly that - delving into his motives for the vilification, given that "free speech" needs to be protected.<<

Oh. It was me.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/wilders-acquitted-in-hate-trial/story-e6frg6so-1226081233590
Justice and truth still lives