Probably the greatest debate this century so far is the reasons behind the invasion of Afghanistan. Most definitely you could write a thousand books on the topic but this is the first time I've come across ANYONE with as much inside knowledge on the war as Michael Ware saying what he is.

I accidentally found the lecture and I'm SHOCKED at the lack of interest in the topic by anyone in the media. Really though, I think that's intentional. I've been following Michael Ware's career since around 2004 when he was embedded with the US Army in the Battle for Falujah in Iraq. There's a book called House to House by David Bellavia where Ware features for much of the story.

I only found this lecture because I'm 'always' trawling for info on Ware. I cut the relevant section from the original video and uploaded it myself. A link to the full lecture is in the description of the video. Really interested in your thoughts on it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=759T2dkan8s

Still in deep trouble with my service but much more than interested in this.
cannot watch the video, shymesh is like riding a push bike without wheels but will read every post.

im in the same boat as belly
cant watch vidio

dodo limits my web acces

but
re afgan-as i understan

its about getting the drugs to the cia[via rendition flights]
as well as laying some pipeline to china

then there is the 3 trillion
in metals and minerals
to be got at

and of course there is the issue of zionist adgenda
who seek to mutate the semites [arabs]..with depleted uranium bombs

of course there is the issue of jobs for the boysclub
60% of usa economy is built on...making materials for war

[them and big money..big pharma..big medicine
security industry and the big lobby
are the only ones still got jobs]

StG, you really should get one of your own, they are great.

Get one of my own?

Dear Stg,

Thanks for the upload, sobering stuff. It really brings home the point that the 'fundies' are just tools for those in power. The Russians, Yanks, Pakistanis, Indians, Saudis etc use them at will to serve geopolitical strategies while they are a convenient scapegoat when blame needs to be apportioned.

Staggering figures though on how many Australians have served. If one might be a cynic one could be forgiven thinking the high rotations are because our military chiefs welcome the chance to 'battle harden' our forces in a relatively 'safe' conflict.