The Forum > General Discussion > The "local dog catcher" I'm over it!
The "local dog catcher" I'm over it!
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
To those beleaguered souls out there who run the gauntlet dodging the local dog catcher (Modern-day Ranger), while attempting to achieve that “quality time” with fido, leading him on his daily walk to wherever; my sympathy.
This lucky pet owners “special mut” is a sheep dog with not the slightest mal-intent towards anything or anyone, save the local cat population which, I have noticed on many occasions, gives as good as it gets. Then why must “fido” be the constant target of Local Council officialdom with purpose built anti-canine bias, staffed with remnants of Hitler’s Gestapo, aimed directly at dogs and their owners?
Who or what is saved by the raft of laws surrounding an innocent pet such as a sheep dog, Maltese terrier, Chihuahua, collie or any of the vast majority of innocent dogs possessed as pets in most normal households in Australia?
Surely the time is ripe to end mass discrimination by authorities using blunt “blanket rules” applied to all dogs and dog owners ascribing to all such the status of “monster”. In a society forced by rules to be tolerant to each other, why are dog owners picked off and singled out for vicious and authorised attacks on a civil right to walk unattached to their animals, even in remote areas (in my experience) only accessible by four wheel drive vehicles? Where is the sense in this?