Ok spindoc, you think the “significant news items” are about “censorship, suppression, denigration and trivialization of contrary AGW views” ... and you want to use Online Opinion to “post (sic) an anonymous (if that matters a hoot) contrary scientific opinion to the AGW orthodoxy, one of perhaps 1,500 that have not had air time in OZ.”

The more I read your post, the sillier it sounds, and becomes.
Sorry, I won't help you. Try some ‘post-normal scientists’, they seem to be rampant here.

Sonofgloin
You’ve shown your capacity to link to BoM, you haven’t shown your capacity to understand any of it. I'll try again:

http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/change/aus_cvac.shtml

My guess? You won’t understand any of that either.

Csteele
Hmmm, “Christ denier”? Howbout hypocrite?

Dear Bonmot,

I have given it some thought and will respect I don't think hypocrite quite does it. It presupposes that ALG has comprehended Christ's teachings on wealth and peace then consciously decided to speak and act in a manner which contradicted them. I'm not sure he has ever gotten that far. The fundamentalism he has been exposed to is high on scripture but low on indept exploration of the meanings of much of Christ's teachings. Those that are ambiguous or are straight forward but don't fit into an American thinking are denied or twisted into impotency.

Therefore I feel 'Christ denier' is more appropriate but thank you for your suggestion.

Gee, so the destruction of the Nuclear Family is an evil Socialist plot now is it?

Who was it that funded and promoted the rise of women in the workplace so they could access a cheaper source of labour and simultaneously displace foreign workers?

Who was it that resisted the 40 hour working week for so long?

Who is it that campaigns against penalty rates to keep workers on the job for longer periods for the same pay?

Who has promoted totally flexible trading hours that have shattered the idea of traditional weekends?

One guess - and it wasn't the Socialists.