Pericles made the claim on this thread Australia's Constitution lacks "relevant clauses" http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=4116#104404 in order to suspend or rescind legislation enacted under it's authority. By Pericles' account, Australia's parliaments cannot suspend or rescind legislation which enfranchised women. Does anyone on this forum agree with Pericles?

hi Loudmouth, you've descibed Pericles here as having "far too much integrity, something which you perhaps do not comprehend" http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=4116#105035. Do you agree with Pericles Australia's Constitution lacks relevant clauses to suspend or rescind legislation enacted under it's authority?

hi Antiseptic, awesome reiteration of Loudmouth's use of "gibberish" http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=4116#104525 in support of aghast incomprehension of male privilege. Do you agree with Pericles Australia's Constitution lacks relevant clauses to suspend or rescind legislation enacted under it's authority

The only guarantee a Constitution which provides by original intent for governance conducted by men's legislatures only which admit women under supervision inclusive of leadership can give that women will enjoy equal rights with men, is that it won't happen

Enough people support equal rights between women and men a referendum on a republic governed by agreement between women's and men's legislatures, courts and corporate committees would succeed next Saturday.