Willingly accept?

I think you're confused, do you have scientific proof that homosexuality is not a dysfunction? If not, then it can't be dismissed as a possibility, that is all I am saying.

Evidence suggests that the existence of nature is to procreate, therefore two breading pairs are biologically suited - a male and a female. So yes, heterosexuality is not a dysfunction...agreed.

You seem to think I am declined against homosexuality and have come out bearing arms.

Homosexuality is common in animals, but research shows that when given the opportunity, the animals tend to leave that homosexual "relationship" when presented with a mating partner of the opposite sex.

"Nicnoto, the fact that you so willingly accept the possibility of homosexuality being biologically abnormal, via your "brain dysfunction/chemical imbalance/improper hormones" comments, shows where you are coming from."

And where am I coming from?

I AM ENTERTAINING THE POSSIBILITY.... do you get it now?

No, you're doing more than merely "entertaining the possibility". You're going deeper than that. You're advocating that homosexuality is not quite right, that something is wrong biologically with an individual if they are sexually attracted to a member of the same sex. By using the term "possibility" you're providing for yourself a convenient way to manoeuvre.

In WW2 some Nazis thought that Aryans were biologically superior to the blacks and Jews and others. To them, if you weren't Aryan then it was "possible" that you had improper hormones, a brain dysfunction, a chemical imbalance. After all, they believed that science had not proven that this wasn't so, therefore they considered that they had open minds.

Homosexuality has everything to do with hormones, brains and chemicals. It has nothing to do with "IMPROPER" (your term) hormones/brains/chemicals.

Do you now get it?

Isn't it often said that the probability of Godwin's law applying something that increases with thread length? This is only 8 pages.

You're playing on my words.

Like I said, you have no scientific proof that homosexuality is not due to a chemical, hormonal, DYSFUNCTION/IMBALANCE/WHATEVER.

I say dysfunction because the function of nature is to reproduce MALE and FEMALE.

You can't rule it out without evidence.

Before the thread is filled with gay right activists freaking out at my posts, twisting what I say into something unmeant, can I just inform everyone that I am a very happy lesbian.

Having said that, I am open to believe that ANY explanation for homosexuality, given it is backed up by scientific evidence is possible.

Brave girl Nicnoto (if what you write is true)!
Good luck to you now :)

I don't like to think that my gay godson is 'abnormal' or 'dysfunctional' in any way.
He is a very intelligent young man who has a lot to contribute to society.
I believe he was 'naturally' born as a homosexual male.