Dear Jockey

I was fortunate enough to read your humorous ditty before it was so ignominiously deleted. However, I think it is only fair to warn you (given the number of times I have been suspended) that you should never EVER disagree with the moderator - apparently this rule has been recently added to OLO's rules, although it was not there when I (and others) made this dreadful mistake.

Fond regards.

I'll give Graham the benefit of the doubt. You see, he did say it was "toilet" language, and yes I did humurously use the word drut (spell it backwards). So I suspect Graham considered that to be beyond the realms of decency even though it was used in a humurous poem.

Gee, I tell ya what, I'm glad old Shakespeare isn't alive today and on OLO. He'd be banned outright because of all those naughty words he used.

Oh yes, Graham please forgive me for using the word drut in this post. I promise to go to confession tomorrow before Mass.

Shadow Minister just said "Nah Nah Nah Nah".

LOL.

Now let's get back to Rob Oakeshott.

Dear SM,

Try to resist knocking freedom of expression
even though you support a political party
that believes that their members must toe
the strict party line.

There are those
in politics who believe that freedom of
speech is desirable because it enables
people to add to their knowledge. People
like Rob Oakeshott for example. ;-)

When I first started, when I overstepped the bounds, my posts were deleted. If I did so again they would be deleted again as per the rules.

The difference is that I read the rules and then followed them, and did not resort to childish claims of bias.

Obscenity, and toilet language are not acceptable. Suck it up, grow a pair and play by the rules.

It is entirely possible to express oneself without obscenity or flaming, well for most of us anyway.

Dear SM,

Some may find your expressions of,

"Suck it up, grow a pair..."

as rude, crude, and lewd. Yet to you
that's acceptable, as the norm.

I guess it all depends on who's doing
the expressing. We get it!