The Forum > General Discussion > Our sloppy rule of law
Our sloppy rule of law
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
-
- All
Posted by Peter the Believer, Wednesday, 14 July 2010 6:46:19 AM
| |
CJ, here’s the new thread that you prompted me to start:
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=3794 This really is unbelievable, both in terms of the principles of road safety and our rule of law! Posted by Ludwig, Thursday, 15 July 2010 9:53:40 AM
|
A warrant can only be issued by a court. It must be served personally. It must be obtained after due process of law, and that requires a Royal Identifier on the warrant, and a deputy of Her Majesty Elizabeth the Second on the bench of that court. Kevin07, and his ministers have gone part way towards, restoring the Rule of Law. They have mostly replaced the word Court, in Acts with court, because that is the way it is spelt 21 times in Ch III Constitution and a court of Judicature, must offer a jury as of right.
The Queen is of enormous practical use as the fountain of all justice. In Victoria their Constitution in S 3 provides that the laws of England shall apply to the administration of justice: But they are not paying their Magistrates to uphold the laws of Australia. That should be a Commonwealth responsibility. You should not only be paying them they same money as a High Court Justice in Chambers gets, you should also make it tax free just like the High Court is tax free.
Sometime after 2003, the Supreme Court in New South Wales eradicated the Royal Identifier, from process issued out of its Registry. It now has a symbol that looks a bit like the rough end of a pineapple, which is what a person gets as law in New South Wales. The cops still wear a Crown, but the Courts don’t