Here’s a general thread that I started exactly two years ago on the utter duplicity between the law and accepted practice regarding nude beaches in Queensland. It turned out to be a very good discussion.

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=1976&page=0

It appears Peter that some of those archaic laws are still excellent laws if Australians follow up or enforce them [I was wrong generalising about some of the 1900 Laws that have created loopholes this century]as you have outlined above.

Many thanks for all of your giving revelational input; I am learning a great deal along with, undoubtedly, many other Australians.

I thoroughly enjoy learning about this Theological Law Peter, therefore if you could commence a thread, it would be appreciated most kindly. There are probably many other Australians interested in knowing more about the history of the Victorian Acts and Legislation.

Enjoy your week.

Here's one to get Ludwig's dander up:

<< Learner drivers can speed up to five times and still pass test
>>

http://tiny.cc/kw4of

;)

Thanks CJ. You’re right, that’s got my dander up.

Stay tuned for a new general thread. Rrrrgh! |:>{

Open Letter to Tony and Julia
One of you must do something about Australian Magistrates. While you allow the Australian Government Solicitor to represent you in the Magistrates Court, in Victoria and Australia and these people are ignorant and only partly educated, we will continue to have a slip, slop slap, attitude to the Rule of Law in Australia, and you are just an expensive luxury, of little or no practical use to the Australian community.

You may lead one of two alternatives, you may be an atheist and a Christian, you may both have law degrees, but until you give to us, the Australian people, a clear and practical body of peacekeepers, available to everyone in every community, you are in gross dereliction of duty. You have to pay for what you want these Magistrates to do. How in the name of the Good Lord, do you expect Magistrates to uphold the legislation you pass, if you expect them to work for nothing?

I was an observer in the Magistrates Court at level 6 Court 28, William Street Melbourne, yesterday and I saw with my own eyes, and heard with my own ears, a Magistrate commit an offence against the laws of the Commonwealth. The offence is against S 139.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995, a clear and practical law of the Commonwealth, that you have a duty to see is upheld. The fact that you have been a bunch of lazy and sloppy Parliamentarians since the 7th January 1991, and have nt legislated in the name of the Queen since that date, means that no one really has to take too much notice of what you do.

The Criminal Code Act 1995 defines anyone who acts under a law of the Commonwealth, in its Dictionary, as a Commonwealth Public Official. The magistrate made an unwarranted demand on a Commonwealth Public Official. He was led astray by a Sydney Lawyer, acting for a major Bank, involved in thievery, assisted by the criminal and unconstitutional Supreme Court in New South Wales. No one works for nothing. To be continued.