The Forum > General Discussion > Australia's regional dead-end
Australia's regional dead-end
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Like those of Paul Keating before him, Howard's proclamations about Australia's future lying within Asia are reminiscent of Morocco's futile bids for EU membership. Australia is not an Asian country, neither geographically nor culturally. In this particular case, I happen to believe Howard is little more than a crass opportunist, sycophantically giving lip-service to the ideal of integration with Asia in order to secure a FTA with ASEAN. While our politicians are wise to promote greater trade with Asia, Australia's political future does not lie with nascent East Asian regionalism. We shall never be accepted as a member of the wider Asian community, and that's not only because of geographical realities. Leaving aside the fact that Beijing is closer to London than it is to Canberra, Australia's values, history, institutions, political system and culture are not the same as our northern neighbours. We have the characteristics of a European nation, not an Asian one. When recently asked about his opposition to Australia's involvement in Asian affairs, the recalcitrant Dr. Mahathir Mohamad quipped that Australia is "basically European", and therefore, not a member of the Asian community. This is the attitude that most Asian leaders share, albeit less pugnaciously, and they are essentially correct in calling a spade a spade. I'm all in favour of greater economic engagement with Asia if it means more export opportunities. However, beyond expanded trade linkages, Australia is at a regional dead-end.
Continued below...