The Forum > General Discussion > King Bill?
King Bill?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Without thought, this fellow abused his position to fly a large Chinook helicopter to a stag party. As a military officer he should have been charged and court-martialed. It was a bit of a fluke and a sign of the diminished influence of the royals that the story got to air at all. On the other hand, had it been the PM, he would have been tendering his resignation.
There is a real ugliness behind the power and patronage of the Windsors, as can be seen by the treatment given by the Queen and her family to the unfortunate people who have married in. If that doesn't demonstrate the gulf between the spin and reality, what might? The British PM looks absolutely foolish when he says that the Queen is a unifying influence. I guess he was talking about the position not the person, but even of so an elected, accountable president would be much more likely to be seen as a unifying figure.
I have no interest in making a personal attack on any of the royal family, just trying to lift HRH's hem ever so slightly to show the very fallible and sometimes wilful and unaccountable human beneath.
The republican demand is for own head of state with a proper mandate from the people. However at the same time it is appropriate to seek some accountability from the foreign queen who has a vested interest in putting the Windsor aristocrats first, then England and beggar the colony that has propped up England with tonnes of gold and troops to fight their wars.
Go along with the purple spin for Willie, never!