Sheesh Arjay, and there was silly old me, thinking that preventing
the Taliban from once again running Afghanistan, was actually a
good thing for the Afghan people. Clearly you don't agree.

People like Mullah Omar and Zawahiri who now runs Al Queda, really
do love you!

Of course I have Arjay.

>>Pericles,have you ever bothered to look at the evidence?<<

And a bigger collection of half-baked theories, based on wild assumptions, backed up by the need for collusion on a massive scale, I have yet to see.

Every single "claim" has been exposed as nothing more than wild speculation.

The only mystery that remains is "why"?. Why do these people insist upon making idiots of themselves?

The only possible answer can be that they feed off the credulity of all the Arjays of this world, for their five minutes of "fame".

>>Many ask how they logistically keep this a secret.Well they kept the Manhatton Project secret which gave us the nuclear bomb<<

If you cannot discern any difference between a top-secret scientific project conducted by a small, close-knit team of scientists and their supervisors, and a scheme that would need to be undertaken by literally hundreds of people from different walks of life, over a number of months, and in broad daylight, then there is no wonder that you can be sucked in by the tall tales you find on the internet.

>>You have other agendas which are not about learning the truth.All you can do is ad hominem attacks to hide your bias.<<

The only "other agenda" that I have is a purely humane one. I hate to see people - even people whom I have never met, and am unlikely ever to meet - throw away their lives on such garbage.

Admit it, Arjay. Conspiracy theories are your hobby.

And they seem to be rapidly approaching obsession. If they haven't already reached that stage.

One day you'll wake up to the fact that you have been chasing shadows all your life, and regret every single minute you spent doing so.

I have to say that this doesn't actually keep me awake at night, because I am a firm believer that everyone should be allowed to choose their own way through life.

But, apart from my instinctive knee-jerk tendency to shout "rubbish!", when I read rubbish, it is the only "other agenda" that I have.

Both the towers and more particularly building 7 came down at the free fall speed of gravity.If the kinetic energy of the upper stories above the planes was being used to crush the lower stories,how were freefall speeds attained? A man sky diving reaches a maximum speed of 200 kph.Both the towers and WTC 7 reached speeds in excess of this.My theory is that the explosives created a vacuum which made this possible,but according the the laws of physics,for every re-action there is an equal and opposite re-action.So as the explosions created a vacuum they also created upward forces that should to a large degree cancel this out.I presented this theory to the engineers and the jury is still out. What do you think?

If you view the new video evidence of the towers you will see pulverisation of the floors way below the main collapse zone and squibs or lesser explosions lower. North tower Prof David Chandler physicist http://www.youtube.com?v=dtx_GcFCs6c&ferature=related

There is no evidence of layered collapse as suggested by the official theory ie no pan caked floors.Girders weighing many tonnes were projected horizontally over 200m. Human bone fragments small as a coin on the top of buildings.

We have photographic evidence of molten steel that according to workers flowed like lava.Steel melts at twice the the optimum temp of jet fuel,yet we have vast evidence of molten steel.

Then we have the scientific evidence of Prof Niels Harrit and his team of 8 scientists with evidence of nano-thermite known only to the US military.This is forensic science with no grey areas of doubt.Why does not the ABC and our corp media not try to disprove these realities?

Pericles if you want to live up to your pseudonym,go to http://www.aetruth.org/ and post on OLO your logical proof of their flawed assertions.

I think you are both intellectually dishonest and gutless.Prove me wrong.

The evidence is overwhelming,yet Pericles deniesn the reality.

You really don't get it, do you Arjay.

>>Both the towers and more particularly building 7 came down at the free fall speed of gravity<<

Every single statement you make about the WTC attack is speculative, including this one.

>>My theory is that the explosives created a vacuum which made this possible,but according the the laws of physics,for every re-action there is an equal and opposite re-action.So as the explosions created a vacuum they also created upward forces that should to a large degree cancel this out.I presented this theory to the engineers and the jury is still out. What do you think?<<

What do I think?

I think that you have a fertile imagination, that what I think. But your "theory" needs a little more work.

>>the explosives created a vacuum<<

In what circumstances does an explosion create a vacuum?

I actually feel quite bad asking the question, because there isn't a vestige of a chance that you could answer it coherently.

>>as the explosions created a vacuum they also created upward forces<<

"Upward forces", Arjay?

How did they achieve this? Why were they not "downward forces"? Or even "lateral forces"?

>>forces that should to a large degree cancel this [vacuum} out.<<

So, have I got this right?

You have i) an explosion that ii) creates a vacuum, then iii) creates an upward force that iv) cancel each other out?

On the face of it, such a sequence of events would cause very little damage indeed, would they not?

>>I presented this theory to the engineers and the jury is still out.<<

I doubt they will return a verdict until they are able to keep a straight face while delivering it.

>>Pericles... post on OLO your logical proof of their flawed assertions.<<

I don't need to prove (or even disprove) anyone's flawed assertions, Arjay. Merely to point out that they are fatally flawed is sufficient.

You still haven't explained, by the way, how the vast amount of activity that would have been required to support your fantasy was able to be kept secret.

Arjay, whilst you are busy dreaming up new conspiracy theories,
you are going to have to come up with another one, to replace
the old "pipeline through Afghanistan" one, which is around
10 years old.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/KL24Ag04.html

gives a more up to date account as to what is going on with all
that energy. Fact it the Chinese have not been sleeping and in
fact have built pipelines to China instead. Not only that, they
are majorly investing in Kazaksthan oil and gas production,
all energy for China.

So its back to the drawing board Arjay :)

.

Rise to the challenge Pericles.Perhaps you and Yabby could find some experts and look at "Blue Print for Truth" http://www.ae91truth.org/
and demolish their logic and facts item by item.

You see Yabby and Pericles,if I think that an assertion is nonsense,I pay little notice to it and give it no creedence.Both of you have consistantly dogged my postings over the last 12 months which shows that it is a threat to either your agendas,or those to whom you pay homage.

So again put up or shut up.Disprove what the Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth have discovered.Take a copy of their CD to the Physics Dept of Sydney Uni and they might be able to assist you.Perhaps also send and email to Physics Prof Steven Jones whom I met recently.

Perhaps you and Yabby can reverse all notions of logic.War can be peace,chaos be order, and more work make the debt slaves free.

NB The theory of the explosives creating a vacuum thus effecting speeds greater than freefall,is solely mine and has no basis in fact.The other revelations of ae911truth do have revelations based in fact and verifiable scientific evidence.

I await your posting on OLO with keen interest,but won't hold my breath.