>>Well with ignorant ding-bats like you I am obviously needed here… to educate.. but I must admit with you and the rest of the swill who venture on to this site…<<

Don't hold back will you, Col.

Actually, your impersonation of a libertarian is a fraud. A true libertarian would never put people down, but take them as they are say "Do your best at whatever you do". You prove yourself to be a con artist pure and simple.

The more you crap on, the more you dig a big hole for yourself as you show your true self. Promise to keep it up, won't you.

>>Am I doing well? You bet your sweet arse I am.<<

Need you say any more? Me, myself and I are all paramount in your world. You can have it.

Try to stand over me and I'll continue to rebut your self-serving rubbish.

Gentlemen please ...

Can we go back to the topic of this thread...

You've both made your points.

Now how about letting it go?

Now,Now,Now.
People please.
I have always said that there is too much freedom,and i mean liberal freedom, in this country,where anyone can have thier arguments heard.
Not saying that anyone is wrong,But,and there is always a but,do we allow too many voices in this country to be heard when we should just make decisions,or not make decsions,based on the context of the topic.
The point of the post was that people sometimes make decisions that do no not affect them directly.
Example being the people that determine how long a bad debt stays on the credit listing,for an individual
Which is 5 years.
This can determine an individuals entire future.
Now the point being that the people deciding upon that time frame do not have to worry about a credit file listing.Remembering that you can be listed for being late on your power bill,which is easy to do.
These are the crucial decisions that are killing us all slowly, taking away our hope.
An example of many things that people overlook.We must queston everything that happens in our society in this country or we are truly the herd controlled by the masters within our social condition,spoon fed our daily dose.

Hi Foxy

Which part of “treat the cancer comment as a joke“

Would you like me to let go of?


Maybe I should “let go “ because RobP feels “heartily sick” and it disturbs his "sensitive nature"?


This thread is supposedly about “WHO HAS THE POWER”


Well, whilst I still have the power to post, I will, freely and without regard to

the disgusting perspectives of the likes of RobP,


his cancerogenous sense of humour


or his “heartily sick“ and disgusting view of who and what views should be allowed on an opinion board.


So, after due consideration,


I must decline your request.


The topic (Who has the power) speaks for itself


I, for one, will never surrender anything or yield my personal right or fall into line, simply to pacify the likes of RobP or any other self opinionated “elitist” (those who we are talking about, after all) of the "left" or "right"(not that it ever seems to be a problem for the “right”).


or abdicate my personal rights of free expression,


Such requests are offensive to me,


just as I would expect such a request to be offensive to you.

Oscar “have always said that there is too much freedom,and i mean liberal freedom, in this country,where anyone can have thier arguments heard.”

Oh yes, as comrade Lenin said “It is true that liberty is precious; so precious that it must be carefully rationed.”

Of course he also had his own way of ensuring the ration process

“One man with a gun can control 100 without one.”

And so did uncle Joe

“Death solves all problems - no man, no problem.”

I guess, I see the curtailment of personal oral and aural liberty to be the first step toward despotism, of any sort

And that is a path of civic curtailment along which I seek to protect us all from (regardless how altruistic that might seem).

“The point of the post was that people sometimes make decisions that do no not affect them directly.”

So do you prefer a decision to be made by

someone who could be described as “objective” and has no “interest” in the outcome, like a judge, dispensing justice between plaintiffs

or

someone with what might be seen as a “vested interest” in the outcome,

such as an insider trader or a property speculator holding land in an area which might be about to be rezoned or a “politician” with “sponsors” who are insider traders and speculators or a judge who is related to a plaintiff?

Regarding “credit ratings” and the removal of defaults from records. I would note the reason for a credit record is to protect other potential creditors from the bad experiences of previous creditors.

A “credit referral” is not there to offer opportunity to a bad debtor or extend to him new victims to practice his past profligacy.

Quite the opposite

Col,

If you're serious, it's you who is disgusting. If you're joking, you are plain pathetic.

I know my view's not something that everyone understands, but it is real enough for a proportion of the population and I mean it seriously. Whichever of the two views you happen to have, you're not impressing me one jot, despite your low-level attempts to stir me up or get your jollies or whatever.

I'm not interested in carrying this on any further as there is a limit to which you can go before you realise you're wasting your time. That limit has come.

There's a challenge in this for you. See if you can make yourself useful on OLO and upgrade yourself into a pony that has more than one party trick.