The Forum > General Discussion > Freddo Frog policing
Freddo Frog policing
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
http://www.illawarramercury.com.au/news/national/national/general/boy-12-to-fight-freddo-frog-charge/1678648.aspx?src=rss
http://greensmps.org.au/content/media-release/freddo-frog-case-confirms-need-urgent-justice-reform
I don't have any faith in the police at the best of times. I'd love to have faith in them as I believe in a strong rule of law, that applies equally to all. But it seems to me that you just cannot know what to expect from the police, at any time, regarding any matter.
Just this morning I went into Casino police station to report the most absurd and dangerous antics imposed upon me on the open highway by a driver towing a horsefloat for goodness sake!
I was in and out of the police station wthin five minutes, having given all the necessary details, that were written down by an officer on a piece of scrap paper. I presume I'll never hear from them again even though they said that they would call me in due course.
On other instances, that sort of thing has taken a long period of time, including filling out forms and giving a full written statement.
So to the freddo frog matter. Ok so the cop is sticking to his principles and upholding the charge. Well, if all cops did the same, then fine. If we had a zero-tolerance policing system, then ok. If we had a system that applied approximately equally to all and in which we had a pretty reasonable idea of what to expect then it would be ok.
But we don't. Faaaaaar from it!!
We just CANNOT have a system whereby trivial issues like this are officially dealt with while much more serious matters, such as some of the driving that I have experienced and reported over the last ten years, go unpunished.
Why do the police have wide-ranging powers of discretion if not for the better use of their own judgement about what is serious enough to pursue and what isn't?