The Forum > General Discussion > Spoil the cake and batter the child
Spoil the cake and batter the child
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
What makes this really interesting is that it comes in the wake of a plebiscite in New Zealand where New Zealanders agreed http://tinyurl.com/yfwyyly 87% to 12% that it was OK to smack a child. Informal polls in the newspapers suggest a similar majority would hold here. But the New Zealand pollies (of all stripes) have refused to change the laws to conform with the poll.
In Queensland a few years ago the Chief Judge in the District Court Patsy Wolfe didn't convict a woman who had used a tree branch to hit her child. Wolfe, a mother of 5, got a lot of public support.
Yet there is also research that says that smacking a child lowers its IQ http://tinyurl.com/yhqw9kv.
In my career as a child I was only smacked or caned once. My slightly younger and ever so smart sister attracted the stick all the time. I dread to think how much smarter than me she could have been.
I've smacked some of my children, but only about once in a lifetime that I can remember. So I don't have an in principle problem with it. But I do tend to think there are generally better ways of dealing with discipline problems. When I've smacked it's generally been to get a child to pay attention when there wasn't time to use gentler forms of persuasion - it's a circuit breaker. Stinging rather than hurting.
But by and large I think if you have to rely on smacking, then you've lost. Am I just reflecting my goodie two shoes childhood, or am I right. And if right, why is the public mood so heavily in favour of corporal punishment? I think I would find a wooden spoon more appropriate for mixing the cake than battering the child.